SeaBass

MLB.com does offer a standalone subscription for MLB Network for $5.99/month. Doesn't feel worth it to me but maybe for 2 or 3 months a year it wouldn't be awful. I could maybe see signing up during the last couple months of the baseball season to follow playoff races. But I probably wouldn't even then honestly.

The only choices for Wisconsin residents to watch Brewers games via streaming are: 1) FanDuel Sports Network, standalone website or app (live local sports only): https://fanduelsportsnetwork.com/ Price is $19.99/month or $189.99/year plus tax 2) fubo TV (live television with regional sports): https://www.fubo.tv/welcome The PRO package is the minimum tier for Brewers games Price is $84.99/month plus tax 3) DIRECTV stream (live television with regional sports): https://streamtv.directv.com/ The CHOICE package is the minimum tier for Brewers games Price is $114.99/month plus tax If you're going to stick with YouTube TV as your regular live TV streaming service then you wouldn't want fubo or DIRECTV stream you'd want only one of those 3 services since they all have live TV networks etc. YouTube TV does not offer FanDuel Sports Network so you'd need to use FanDuel's website/app to watch Brewers games as long as you are a Wisconsin resident. Outside of Wisconsin the only option would be MLB.TV and hope you aren't in a blacked out region.

I see Kuzma as more of a Bobby Portis replacement than a Middleton replacement. And maybe that will come to pass in the next 24 plus hours.

I think a lot of what's going on with the Bucks, a team that won a championship, helps me feel better about the Brewers situation. A lot of folks would sell everything for a Brewers WS title (and I'd be tempted too) but do we want to fall back into irrelevance for a long stretch as a price? Maybe the Brewers method is the better way. They haven't had luck in the postseason but having a good team is fun to follow. All I see in the Bucks future is darkness. And maybe that's even too negative but I sure like the Brewers situation better.

I agree but also if the Bucks could trade every one of their 1st round picks they would, so they essentially did that here. But yes, it's a cluster. This team is going to go down eventually and it's going to be apocalyptic for years before they return to the light.

It's such a Milwaukee thing (bad luck) that teams had been getting away with swapping superstars for years but when the Bucks finally get a team together the league changes the cap rules right in the middle of their championship window. Right up there with the MLB all star game finally being held in Miller Park but then the game ends in a tie due to roster limits.

Player wise it's not a great trade but I assume it brings some salary cap relief. That's really the only reason they do this trade.

The Bucks notoriously struggle on road trips out west. Regardless of how good they are. Not worth overreacting to.

Shouldn't we be rooting for the Dodgers to continue signing literally everyone? Eventually other owners will tire of it and demand changes. Fans will likely disconnect from the sport as well. The Mets will probably join them with Cohen's wealth propelling them. They're just getting started under Stearns and while I made a joke when the Mets signed Soto that they didn't need Stearns to make that move he will keep the team in line by knowing which guys to stay away from, like Pete Alonso. There's a guy the Mets absolutely would have thrown too much money at before Stearns got there.

Cool, just take the ones from the 60's onward and they still have them beat by one. The 2000's is an odd line in the sand. Don't care. Not any more special. In fact, these are the days of breathing on a QB gets you a personal foul penalty. The game is the easiest it's ever been. Recency bias really needs to die in a fire. Somebody tell the Yankees they don't really have 27 World Series titles, they actually only have 2.

If only the NFL had history preceding the Super Bowl era then maybe the Patriots wouldn't be on top of any mountains. Maybe in this fictional reality it would be the Packers instead.

I agree, it's all gravy now that the Lions' and Vikings' drought is assured of continuing. I'm all for Buffalo getting over the hump. I don't really have secondary teams in my sports fandom but I've always liked the Bills. Rooted for them in all those Super Bowls they didn't win in the early 90s, they're a smaller market at just under 300,000 population so there's another reason. The fatigue is real with KC. On top of that is they just feel like a very uninspired and dull team that is somehow defying the odds and still winning. I don't get it but here they are again. I don't dislike them they way I hated the Patriots but they're travelling down that road. If they make it back I passionately hope they lose.

0-1 is the only record that matters for you this season, Detroit.

Nothing better than watching the Lions absolutely choke on one of their own trick plays.

To be fair, he's got my donation beat by about $500K.

So long, Mr. Uecker. RIP Legend.

There's the price of having your #6 WR in the game.

Olé pass blocking ain't gonna get it done.

The Bears have DJ Moore and I don't think anybody is confusing him with Ja'Marr Chase. He still came through for his team and helped give them a chance to win. It's not even really about Reed. I think I'm mostly sour because the Packers fooled me. I thought they were good. They're merely average, or a tick above. The last 5 weeks of this season have put a real dampener on how I feel about this team. 3 losses in winnable games all against division rivals is deflating in any season. They just can't make the key play at the end of games to secure a victory, all 3 ended with the defense failing to prevent crucial 1st downs that led to game winning field goals. Even the 2 wins feel somewhat hollow in retrospect. New Orleans is a bad football team that was forced to play their backup QB. Still there were stretches of that game where the offensive ineptitude was apparent. I had considered that perhaps the Packers went more vanilla as the game went on to not reveal any plays or tendencies but they were still trying to play offense and score and they just fizzled. But they pitched a shutout so people were happy. Seattle had the feel of a game where the Seahawks could have mounted a comeback but then Geno got hurt and that ended their chances. In the 2nd half the Packers punted 4 times, failed a 4th down conversion and lost a fumble while scoring just 10 points. Pretty uninspiring stuff. Can they still beat any of the teams in the playoffs? Sure, it's possible. I don't think it's likely though. There is a lot of work to do this offseason.

Put my gravestone there because it wasn't irrelevant until after the game had ended. Still lost. The point has been, he's sucked for many weeks and he sucked on Sunday. I don't think there's anything more to add to it.

That one career fumble helped lose the team a game when the Bears scored a TD 3 plays and 21 yards later. He also muffed a punt that I misremembered as a loss of possession but he did in fact recover it.

Sure, as long as he doesn't fumble it away again.

...and capsized. And sunk.

A well earned loss. Can't brag about only losing to the best teams anymore.

Hell of a kick. Now it's up to the defense...