I think Fangraphs is a good resource. I generally prefer Baseball Prospectus now that they've ditched TAv as their primary offensive stat in favor of newly developed DRC+, but I like Fangraphs because I think the site is more navigable. As far as projections, they all have limitations. As others have mentioned, Steamer has some limitations especially this early in the off season. I was actually joking around with some of Brewers twitter a couple days ago about steamer projections for 2019 currently having the Brewers as a last place team. Once zips and pecota roll out and rosters fill out we will have a better idea of what the projections are. Anecdotally, I think some of the strengths the Brewers have don't get measured effectively by projections. I don't think depth is accurately quantified by just innings pitched, plate appearances, and defensive innings. Example: the Brewers played their best baseball in September 2018 and in hindsight it was very predictable. Counsell was able to deploy his 35ish players in the best possible position to succeed and eke out extra situational value. Now the Brewers roster isn't as deep right now as it was in September 2018, but by continuing to improve at the margins (ie Gamel, Spangenberg, Claudio as complements to the returning roster and with minor league options to help over the course of April-Aug) the Brewers could reel off a similarly impressive September in 2019. I also don't think it accurately accounts for an elite (or awful) bullpen. The replacement level used for relievers is different than that used for starters which makes sense in a traditional model, but as the Brewers continue to "blur the lines" between relievers and starters that replacement level becomes less applicable. In summary, I wouldn't get too worked up about what steamer shows as the standings right now and even if zips and Pecota peg the Brewers finishing somewhere other than 1st or 2nd in the NLC.