Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Robocaller

Verified Member
  • Posts

    1,809
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

News

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Top Prospects Ranking

Milwaukee Brewers Videos

2022 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

Milwaukee Brewers Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

2024 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

The Milwaukee Brewers Players Project

2025 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Robocaller

  1. In 2010. Seems like it's the going rate.
  2. I think Small will be our next Brent Suter. Perhaps persisting longer as a multi-inning/spot starter.
  3. I have a hard time wrapping my brain around a premise that equates Woodruff with Suter, two guys with incredibly different stuff and prospect status (Woodruff fell to the 11th round because his performance at MS State wasn't good, in spite of quality stuff, while Suter was picked in the 31st round because his stuff was pedestrian and he was never a significant prospect).
  4. woof. Mets be spending money.
  5. Unless he has a setback, Chourio will be up during 2024. I hope Wiemer is up sometime during 2023, at which point Taylor can be traded.
  6. We're good at CF. Turang should probably never play there.
  7. I'd love it they did that, but I think they'll keep Turang down until sometime in June (super 2).
  8. It's two of the three top 100 lists that they consider. If it's only one, it doesn't count.
  9. You don't need to be on the opening day roster, but you do within about 2 weeks to have enough days of service.
  10. Just because someone sometime made a bad argument that agrees with you doesn't mean that you're right. It's hard to imagine a player denigrated for hitting 11 HRs in limited ABs.
  11. Hiura had a .866 OPS vs RHP in 2022. That's pretty close in the rearview mirror.
  12. I don't think Turang will be on two (or even one) top 100 lists, so he won't qualify. So there will be no benefit of having him on the OD roster, other than his potentially superior play compared to whomever they keep on the roster. I'm not confident the Brewers will do anything that limits their long-term financial interest.
  13. The "better option" will be when Wiemer is on the ML team.
  14. IMO, he's designed to be a placeholder to keep Turang in the minors until after the super 2 cutoff. His success in the minors suggests he could be a breakout candidate, but if he doesn't, we have Turang to bring up. Throw enough crap at the wall, some of it is sure to stick. If Toro and Miller click, Brice might be disappointed for a while (until Adames is traded).
  15. I'm fairly sanguine about Lutz. He could have a trajectory like Taylor, a guy who had some early success, stalled, then recovered his career. With Mitchell, Frelick, Wiemer (and Chourio coming), he doesn't have to be a CF to be the 4th-5th OF. He has to have a good 2023 though.
  16. I wish I could do time jumps. I'd go back and tell my 15-17 year-old self a thing or two. :-)
  17. Mitchell has the better arm. He'd be the RF when they're both on the field (with Yelich).
  18. I agree with this, except in 2024, Mitchell will be playing CF and Frelick LF. And Taylor might be gone.
  19. Unless they avoid super 2 with Frelick (delaying his promotion), I see Frelick and Mitchell getting most of the starts in CF and RF. Taylor will get plenty of time playing RF when Frelick or Mitchell sits, and playing LF when Yelich sits or plays DH.
  20. This is where I am. I think Turner would rather take a 1-yr $9M contract from the Dodgers than a 2-yr $30M contract from the Brewers. And I don't think the Brewers would go that high.
  21. I predict we don't acquire anyone better than Owen Miller, who we just got. I'd love for them to sign Turner. I don't expect it. Maybe sign some has-been or never-was who might compete for a position. Probably on a minor league contract with S.T. invite.
  22. They don't have to play at the same time. If they play for the same team, they will be getting similar opportunities. Of course, they both need to have a fair number of innings at the position so they'll average out. I'm not advocating for using RF, just indicating when it is a reasonable stat to look at.
  23. If two guys play for the same team, it's reasonable they played against similar competition and with similar pitching.
  24. I didn't know they stopped having a baseball team (1991 was last year).
×
×
  • Create New...