Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

mudbutt

Verified Member
  • Posts

    178
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

Milwaukee Brewers News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Top Prospect Rankings

Milwaukee Brewers Videos

2022 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Milwaukee Brewers Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Milwaukee Brewers Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2024 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Milwaukee Brewers Players Project

2025 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by mudbutt

  1. As long as Ashby is a multi inning guy instead of say a one inning closer, I prefer him in that role especially when he can throw 90 innings like he did in the regular season last year. Also you could argue he’s more valuable than a starter in the post season when you can deploy him in almost every game in high leverage situations. And he ended up throwing the second most innings in the post season and only one less than Miz.
  2. I'd give the questionable guys a shot first and then we can always trade for a vet before the trade deadline.
  3. Salary caps are based on revenue thus impacting what is available for paychecks. And saying the owners are willing to put 3/4 billion dollars in additional salaries is the problem, that's actually not true. They are putting expenses outside of salaries like pensions and other benefits into their proposed salary cap. The owners want a CBA that will earn them more money, anything else like competitive balance talk is just a narrative tool to try to get leverage in getting more money. And to your comment Thurston, yes there are always things to battle over. But right now in the current state there is no cap and it is much easier to have leverage and whittle down something that already exists versus something that does not.
  4. Because they see what happened to other leagues with that arrangement. Owners play games with what is actually defined as revenue, so it’s not actually a 50/50 split. Which is already happening now with the MLB negotiations as the proposed floor and cap include more than just salaries. And then what happens in every CBA afterwards, the revenue definition is fought over, along with the percentages, to slowly whittle down the players each CBA expiration.
  5. Just Baseball and some others think he will accept it as well. I think it makes a ton of sense with the QO slightly deflating his market to accept. I think the 23 million plus the contract he will get after next year will very likely outdo what he’d get on the market this year. And if he turns back into a pumpkin, you still got 23 million. Very much hope he accepts and I think people vastly overrate Vaughn. Glad we don’t have to wait long to find out.
  6. They basically did though, he was waived from the 40 man roster and elected free agency over being assigned to Nashville. Then later resigned a minor league deal last year. What a story.
  7. Starting Hamilton against a lefty would be wild. Looks like same lineup as game 1, with Vaughn starting at DH, Lara in RF and Ortiz at third.
  8. It's not about depth, it is about having high end pitching. Elite starter and high leverage relievers to lockdown the 7/8/9 is much more consistent and favorable over slugging in a short series. I would not want to face the Phillies in the wild card round.
  9. Agreed Ragsdale is fine but both him and Frias is tough.
  10. Probably just pushing everyone out to get extra rest
  11. Going to play a ton if you are a lefty that’s effective against left handed pitching
  12. Houston wanted more room under the luxury tax so we essentially bought Gordon by taking on 2.5 of McCullers salary and DFAing him for them.
  13. 2.5 million but it was always about getting Gordon for depth with that money.
  14. Correct you could draft someone and you held their rights until like a week or so before the next draft, so a team could wait to make an offer after watching them play more. The only thing that’s not simple is the pooled money. You don’t know exactly how much a team will have left so do you play the waiting game and get a bumped up offer near the deadline that sways your decision? Or do you wait too long and a different draftee gobbles up what is left.
  15. No it's just dumb rumor mill stuff that spreads in social media because of course every fan would fantasize getting him.
  16. Probably prep guys in the 11-20th where we can throw a couple hundred thousand out and get a bite.
  17. I wouldn't put much weight on a trade when it was a guy cut and traded for cash in the waiver process.
  18. Folks wanted more outfielders in the system so bam there we go.
  19. Funny you could easily swap our two guys and it would be probably their “normal” position. Wondering if they went Ebel first to go underslot then got a pleasant surprise that Sawyer was still there and may have to spend some of Ebels money there. Fine by me, get the power early then go pitching.
  20. Man the more I looked at Rose the less I wanted him for the Brewers. At 6 is crazy, even if underslot.
  21. They aren’t firing on all cylinders at the moment but every team has downswings. Hitting is hard these days. Yea of course it would be nice to have better hitters in spots but that’s every team. Brewers are better off than most so hooray.
  22. I would wager they’d rather have Stallings pitching regularly over being the guy that can go over a week without an appearance.
  23. I am also really thinking it will be Marchand as I think the other Brewer type targets will be gone by then, unless the Brewers really zag with the smaller pool this year and go with an underslot pitcher or something.
×
×
  • Create New...