I guess part of it is that there was less of an expectation "back in the day", and people wouldn't freak out over every win and loss. We also had a very self-policing userbase, and the whole idea of issuing "warnings" and "strikes" was completely foreign. Yes, there were less threads and fewer posts, but there were also much fewer one-liners and people repeating the same opinion over and over, because there was less noise to feel you had to "yell" through. At the same time, I do enjoy the site's popularity these days. The biggest thing I enjoy is watching someone come in with a certain level of interest and knowledge about the team and the sports, and then clearly grow in that interest as time goes on. I enjoy "read it on brewerfan" becoming common vernacular for a lot of fans, players, and media-type people. Rolling with the site's growth is the biggest challenge we've faced to date. We've implemented more rigid rules, and made it more challenging to apply for access (you now have to fill out an application, where we expect something more than "YOST BLOWZ! LET ME IN!". We've added a slew of moderators as well, as the sheer volume of posting has become overwhelming to moderate. I really, really feel that changes need to be made within the userbase. I'd prefer that it would be communicating to users what our expectations are, but obviously removing users is an option on the table. I just want to say that I think the vast majority of you are doing a real fine job, and if you haven't got a PM about a strike or a warning, we've had absolutely no problems with you. Obviously, it only takes a few vocal repetitive people to "clog up the bases", so to speak... and it's my goal to address these things so that people who've come to believe Brewerfan is the premier place to talk Brewers still believe that.