Nah, this is way too far the other way IMO. Thames STILL after being absolute trash as you describe has the same OBP, higher OPS and higher WAR than Braun, with more HR despite missing a huge chunk of this season. He's had a rotten August. No doubt. Its one rotten month. Prior to that he was a very useful lefty bat as he was last season as well. He's putting his 2020 option in a lot of doubt, but no reason to throw in the towel on him now. I just find it odd that Nate brings up some good points on Thames quoting his hard hit percentage and ISO that ironically Braun defenders use frequently to support their stance that he (Braun) has been unlucky, not bad, but when the shoe is on the other foot, Nate is quickly dismissed. Braun is 291/336/485 in the 2nd half, good for 822 ops. Based on the eye test, Braun has looked much better as well. I think Braun is a better option than Aguilar at the moment, though that's definitely debatable. Braun vs Thames is not even remotely debatable right now. Braun is the better choice, it's not close. That wasn't my stance. I never said Thames is the better choice right now, I just can't understand why in the first half, when people like me said Braun was done, (to which I'd say I was wrong), and other people pointed out that there were signs of optimism in his hard hit contact rate and ISO, are not only dismissing that when it pertains to Thames and calling him DFA territory trash, but exaggerating negative aspects of his performance such as K rate. (It's not 40%). To me, just seems unfair and contradictory. And I don't dispute that Thames looked terrible in August, but he absolutely does have some peripherals in his favor.