Your posts seem to indicate that you think Ortiz is one of the best defensive shortstops in the majors, while analytics grade him as basically average.
This isn’t a criticism of you, because I know many people feel that way.
I want to pose the honest question, why is it that we tend to live and die by metrics around here, but when it comes to Ortiz, we say “nah, metrics be damned, I know when the eye test tells me”.
Again, this is a criticism of no one. Just a genuine question. As fans, do we often slightly inflate what we see defensively from sub par offensive players, subconsciously “compensating”?
Subconsciously, are we more prone to downplaying defensive abilities when the player hits well? Surely there are SS out there that do both well.