IMO Ben is a little loopy if he thinks he is going to get and that he actually wants a 3 year deal for a couple reason. A. No team is going to give him 3 years at his price considering he had a somewhat serious arm injury at the end of last year, not to mention the multitude of other nagging type of injuries he usually gets B. This offseason is obviously a down market, why on earth would Ben want to lock himself into a 3 year contract far below what he is actually worth? Why would he not do a 1 year deal with a player option for year #2? It just doesn't make any sense IMO. That is unless he is still asking for a 3 year deal in excess of $40M or something like that. C. If The Rangers are the only seriously interested team, they are not going to bid against themselves, they probably know that their has been little interest from other teams so there is no reason to give Ben what he wants. It seems Ben has very little if any leverage. I would still love to have him back. Offer the 1st year at $10M and then give him a $12M player option for year #2. If he has a good year next year he can cash in this offseason. You could even put in some escalators if the Brewers make the playoffs, if he makes 30 starts, and if he pitches 180-200 innings.