The one thing that bothers me about OBP is that the probability of drawing a walk seems to be very dependent on the hitter's situation, whereas basehits seem to be mostly independent of situation. True, a batter might mentally prepare themselves differently if they are approaching the plate in different situations ... or a pitcher might "bear down" differently if there are runners aboard or something ... but that's practically impossible to measure. On the other hand, it's somewhat predictable to figue that a pitcher might, say, be more prone to walk a #8 hitter in the NL than any other hitter in the lineup. Thus, I can't really put much weight into, say, Counsell's 2007 OBP. There should be some way to weight the fact that he bats #8 so frequently. He's a walk waiting to happen at two times a game. And actually, I almost think along the same situation-dependent lines about Rickie so far this year. It's nice that he's getting the walks, but it's almost like he's only walking with the bases empty. With runners on, it doesn't feel like he's producing OBP number at the same clip. (Would need to see numbers.) If my perception is right -- could easily be wrong -- it seems like there's a flaw in a stat (OBP) that has certain situations (bases empty) that are more batter friendly than compared to AVG which has the same degree of likelihood/difficulty no matter what the basepaths situation is. Then again, batting average won't take into account how good the on deck hitter is, etc, etc. Obviously, there's no perfect stat -- numbers can't tell the whole story. I think everyone understands that, but sometimes I think OPS (and especially the OBP component) gets too much esteem. EDIT: I managed to kill my signature. *cries*