His post adds to the stats mothership provided rather than refuting them. Exactly. I was merely adding to the data presented, which happened to also be the most current and therefore relevant. The defensive spectrum is about the perceived relative difficulty and importance of defensive at each position. As such, as the game changes and managers continuously reevaluate the value of defense at each position, you?ll see changes to the defensive spectrum. Dan Fox looked at how the defensive spectrum changed throughout the history of baseball: 1900-1910 [ OF - 2B - 1B - 3B - SS - C ] 1911-1930 [ OF - 1B - 2B - 3B - C - SS ] 1931-1972 [ 1B - OF - 3B - C - 2B - SS ] 1973-1995 [ DH - 1B - OF - 3B - C - 2B - SS] 1996-2003 [ DH - 1B - LF - RF - 3B - CF - C - 2B - SS] The spectrum is not statistic, nor its order absolute. It?s just a guideline and right now, it appears managers value defense at 2B only slightly more than at CF. Considering the higher value an average play in the OF has over an average IF play, I can appreciate why. Here?s the Dan Fox articles on the subject: Defensive Spectrum Defensive Spectrum Redux Defensive Spectrum Again