1. I rarely touch an alcoholic beverage. 2. When I do, I never drive. Even one beer is too many in my opinion. I am just curious what your rights are after you are pulled over for drinking and driving. Charles Barkley refused the breathalyzer. (Which I've heard many people do) Instead, Charles went to the hospital and had the blood test done instead. This obviously takes some time because they need to wait to get the results back. In the meantime, I believe he is issued a DUI citation. (Which if the test comes back negative, he can obviously fight) Profootballtalk.com (Whose author is a lawyer), reported that Charles should have refused the blood work as well - as that is within his legal rights. I've heard that you can refuse the breathalyzer, but then you have to take a blood test. I've also heard that if you think you are too drunk to drive - you should take the breathalyzer because it is sometimes wrong. If you think you are sober enough to drive - you should take the blood test to make sure you get an accurate reading. Now, after reading at profootballtalk.com - being forced to take a blood test doesn't make much sense. The government can't really force you to stick a needle in your arm anymore than they can force you to breath into a breathalyzer. So who is right - can you refuse both a breathalyzer and a blood test?