Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic
  • Brewers News & Analysis

    The Milwaukee Brewers Are Locked And Loaded For A Trade Deadline Splash

    With the state of the Brewers farm system (especially at the corner infield spots), are they set to go big at the 2025 MLB trade deadline?

    Jake McKibbin
    Image courtesy of © Angela Peterson / Milwaukee Journal Sentinel / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

    Brewers Video

    In recent seasons, the Milwaukee Brewers have tinkered around the margins, without ever really pushing their chips in. A part of that is down to the farm system, where Milwaukee needs to have a steady stream of talent coming through to remain competitive with the bigger-market teams in baseball. Although they've had a highly ranked system in recent seasons, one thing they lacked was strong depth in the upper minors. A lot of that strength came from the upper end of their system, with Jackson Chourio, Jacob Misiorowski and Jeferson Quero carrying the rankings. In 2025, that's all changed.

    From top to bottom, the Brewers have a plethora of options to trade from: young, controllable pitching that's ready to impact the big leagues, as well as a logjam's worth of bats capable of playing both corner infield spots. In some ways, they would be suppressing the talent they have not to trade some of their higher-value chips at the deadline.

    The Depth of Corner Infield Assets Is Staggering
    The logjam at third base presents three high-upside bats, all of whom possess trade intrigue. Between Luke Adams and Brock Wilken, the Brewers have two players in the difficult offensive environment of the Southern League with a weighted runs created plus (WRC+) at 170 or higher, where 100 is average and higher is better. Wilken has garnered the bulk of playing time at third base, and has shown enough improvement in mobility to be a fringe defender there, while Adams showcases better athleticism but more inconsistent actions.

    Both have prodigious raw power and approaches bordering on passive, with high walk rates (and in the case of Adams, hit-by-pitch rates). Adams swings and misses less than Wilken, but also taps into the long ball less often (Wilken leads the Southern league with 18 home runs by a full five homers, despite missing the last few weeks). Adams has perhaps the greater upside of the two, but if not for injuries, Wilken would be the closer to the big leagues. While both are currently on the injured list, they would both have a chance to make an impact in 2026 in the major leagues, and both would be prized assets in a trade.

    As an even higher-upside player (although one with considerably higher variance), Eric Bitonti could flow into the conversation, as well. You'd be hard-pressed to find anyone with more raw power anywhere in the minor leagues, and Bitonti is still just 19 years old. He entered the system as a shortstop, before moving over to third and then (predominantly) first base amidst the other athletic infield options on the Carolina Mudcats roster. There are swing-and-miss concerns, and his stock has come down because of them, but it's too early to write off the chance that his hit tool progresses and everything takes off.

    Whether he can find more consistent plate coverage and adjustability in the strike zone remains to be seen as Bitonti matures and develops, and if not, he'd rate as much less valuable than Adams or Wilken, but the giant first baseman fields his position well and would create some serious intrigue around the league, were he on the table.

    The reason the Brewers can afford to trade from these positions is the volume of depth they possess. Retaining one of Wilken, Bitonti or Adams alongside Blake Burke should be enough, with Jesus Made and Luis Peña looking to progress to High A Wisconsin on the left side of the infield, while they also have a plethora of first-base options in Triple A. The system is chock-full of talent, to the point where Wilken and Adams were unable to force promotions earlier in the season, and they can use that logjam to their advantage come the deadline. In fact, in a sense, they need to. Room must be made for their incoming draft class.

    Who Doesn't Love MLB-Ready Starting Pitching?
    The other area of surplus from which they can make a splash is their starting pitching depth, most of which is ready to make an impact at the major-league level. The rotation of Jacob Misiorowski, Brandon Woodruff, Jose Quintana, Freddy Peralta and Quinn Priester looks well-poised to perform going into the dog days of summer, but the return of Nestor Cortes after the All-Star break (alongside the controllable contracts of Chad Patrick, Logan Henderson and Tobias Myers) ensures there's room for movement.

    The Brewers will look at this from the (cue groans) bites-of-the-apple angle, seeing what their rotation depth looks like in future seasons as well as this one. With Peralta under control on an affordable club option for one more season and pre-arbitration team control in effect for Misiorowski, Priester, Henderson, Patrick and Myers (on top of some burgeoning depth in Triple A in the form of Coleman Crow and (potentially) Tyson Hardin), the Brewers could enter next season with as many as eight players they would feel comfortable pitching big-league innings as a starter. 

    Even then, we're excluding the opportunities for DL Hall and Aaron Ashby to move back into starting roles, something both pitchers were expected to do in 2025 before injury setbacks pushed them into long relief. With those two stretched out, you could have a double-digit number of arms capable of starting games in 2026. 

    Priester and Henderson are expected to stay, but Myers has begun to showcase some improvements lately, including a 97.8 mph fastball and a returning feel for his changeup—culminating in winning the International League Pitcher of the Week last week. Patrick's cutter is one of the best in baseball. His slider actually grades out favorably in stuff models. If he can gain some command for it, or even feel for a changeup (as a supinator, is he a prime kick-change candidate?), then his profile goes from back-end starter to a mid-rotation arm. Even Hall, whose fastball appears to be slowly returning after working to clean up the mechanical deficiencies caused by his knee issues in 2024, may be attractive to other teams in a starting role. If that fastball shape continues to showcase in July, his value will grow.

    In short, the Brewers could use one of their controllable arms to make a big move, as well. Teams like the Diamondbacks (with Josh Naylor and Eugenio Suárez on the block), the Texas Rangers (Adolís García) and the Boston Red Sox (Alex Bregman) all have high-value assets, and all of them would enjoy some controllable, effective starting pitching.

    Were the Brewers to package Adams, Wilken or Bitonti with an MLB-proven arm with years of team control remaining, they could provide a hefty offer for any of the assets named above. It leaves them with options without compromising their future and that is exactly where the Milwaukee Brewers need to be.

    The team is firing. They have a strong rotation and a lights-out bullpen. They have guts and grit and bat-to-ball skills coming out of their oxsters. When you have a stack of "chips" as large as the Brewers', you can certainly afford to take a risk. The time to move is now.


    What would you think of the Brewers trading the above assets to get a big trade deadline boost in the form of a bat with thump? Would you consider it fair, even if the bat was a rental (or rental plus one for Garcia)? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below!

    Follow Brewer Fanatic For Milwaukee Brewers News & Analysis

    • Like 1
    • Love 1

    Recent Brewers Articles

    Recent Brewers Videos

    Brewers Top Prospects

    Brandon Sproat

    Milwaukee Brewers - MLB, RHP
    Sproat had a rough first appearance in a Brewers uniform (3 IP, 7 ER, 3 HR). On Thursday, he gave up one run on 4 hits and a walk over 6 2/3 innings. He struck out six Blue Jays batters.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    There are players we could trade but I am dead against trading future talent for rentals.  Forget it.

    We have pitching depth and I would especially so be interested in talking trade with short timers.

    I'd hate to see young bats get traded unless we get controllable talent in return.  

    I like our MLB roster just as it is....

    • Like 2

    Looking at the list above of these 8 (or 10, with Hall and Ashby) MLB-ready starters, my thought is the complete opposite; keep them. Starters are expensive. Look at what even league average starters get paid in FA for their declining years. If you can have that for multiple years, for a fraction of the cost, you hold on to that. They have options, some can pitch in the pen, and there *will* be injuries. The last two seasons in particular have shown that you will absolutely need those 8-10 starters, and more. So I think that's absolutely the wrong group to trade from if it is for a rental. 

    For a controllable player, like a Yelich type deal, then obviously you need to give up a fair bit. But for rentals it's short-sighted to give up players who will have an impact in 2026 or even 2025. So I'd hold on to the likes of Wilken and Adams too; wait and see what they do in AAA and MLB. If they're both major league quality players, then consider a trade. It's much more the likes of Bitonti I'd be more willing to trade. Not because I don't believe in them, but because their impact is much further away. If you want to get better now, don't give up something that can help you now or in the very near future. 

    We will see nearer to the deadline who will actually be available, but none of the players available right now seems like someone I'd want to give up these super valuable players for. Someone like Suarez would also incite a real bidding war, with him being a great fit for (at least) the Brewers, Cubs, Yankees, Mets, and probably someone who the Tigers or Phillies would want as well. Whoever gets him will pay a lot. 

    Although as always the real answer isn't as simple as saying "trade from this group, not this",. It's more about trusting your own evaluations, and including players that others teams value higher than you do. That goes even for the MLB-ready pitching. If they value some of these guys like budding aces, rather than "just" solid starters, and are willing to give a return to match it, then you do it. 

    • Like 3

    Nah, stand pat. We need a bat and there's not a bat worthy of a splash. Plus, even though we seem loaded in the minors, not all that talent will pan out or stay healthy. So best keep everyone and increase our chances of getting another Chourio across the finish line.

    • Like 1

    This article sums up my sentiments exactly. You can’t continue to hoard all that redundant talent.

     

    Also, I’m not saying I’m a fan of this idea, just wondering if they might do it: They don’t have room for Cortes at the moment. I don’t trust him because I think his elbow is quite compromised, but he will be coming back soon.

    I wonder if they would sell high on Quintana and then make way for Nestor?

     

    Also, if Tobias truly continues to find it and looks like he did in the playoffs last year, they will have to make room for him.

    • Like 1

    Gasser is ahead of schedule and can easily be included as a definite starter possibility for next year.

    I agree wholeheartedly with this article in trading one or two of the corner infielders.  I'm also ok with trading one of the AAA pitchers but ONLY for a controllable bat, not a rental.  

    Yeah, Suarez would look great in a Brewer uniform so let's shoot for a big package with one of the infielders you mentioned, a solid prospect that was not mentioned (maybe K.C Hunt) and someone like Luis Lara.

    That's 3 prospects in the Brewers Top 30, yeah a lot.  And, how did this hurt the current team or the team in the upcoming 2-3 years?  Doesn't hurt the current team at all and in the future, we have other minor league players who rate higher.  Of course, Suarez has to be available and I'm not sure he's going to be though AZ has their #1 prospect, Jordan Lawler, essentially blocked since he plays 3b.  

    The Brewers still have players on the MLB roster who could be traded to AZ and would not hurt the team much, if any at all.  AZ wants a lefty relief pitcher badly (Koenig?) and could use depth with some position players the Brewers currently have. Or, do a combinationwith the minor league players previously mentioned.

    Jake McKibbin
  • Brewer Fanatic Contributor
  • Posted

    3 hours ago, JohnBriggs12 said:

    Not even a mention of Robert Gasser who looked awfully good last season before his elbow went.  Very curious as to where in his recovery he is 13 months after TJ

    I knew I'd missed someone!

    Gasser is expecting to start rehab outings in the ACL soon enough, I think within the next week? If not then, two weeks

    • Like 2

    I'm really surprised there is no mention of the need for a SS, that is #1 in my eyes above all else.

    Also If were getting rid of Hoskins at the end of the year we will need another 1st baseman anyway.  Andrew Vaughn has been remarkable but only 8 at bats has not convinced me of anything just yet. 

    I would leave Durbin alone. 

    • Like 1
    Jake McKibbin
  • Brewer Fanatic Contributor
  • Posted

    Just now, Brian said:

    I'm really surprised there is no mention of the need for a SS, that is #1 in my eyes above all else.

    Also If were getting rid of Hoskins at the end of the year we will need another 1st baseman anyway.  Andrew Vaughn has been remarkable but only 8 at bats has not convinced me of anything just yet. 

    I would leave Durbin alone. 

    The problem is who? 

    The shortstop trade availability is pretty low this year with a lot of long, big contracts out there or young stars with a ton of control remaining 

    Screenshot_20250711-111125.png

    I say the Problem is Ortiz at SS.  Struggling all season at the plate and even below .200 again as of late (last 15 games)  and never even one hit in a playoff game in his whole life. Shortstops are never cheap but you asked for our biggest need. 

    Collins and Durbin are O.K. until/unless in system youth supplants.  They are bulldogs who have surprised with playing time and added a spark both on offense and defense.  1B remains an open question pending Vaughn's performance.  Perhaps he's the real deal and can man the position until some minor league stud shows up.  

    13 hours ago, Trax said:

    There are players we could trade but I am dead against trading future talent for rentals.  Forget it.

    We have pitching depth and I would especially so be interested in talking trade with short timers.

    I'd hate to see young bats get traded unless we get controllable talent in return.  

    I like our MLB roster just as it is....

    You’re cutting out a pretty big section of the trade market by being anti-rental. Also one of the cheaper sections in terms of prospect cost

    Why not capitalize on your deep farm system when you have a chance to really compete? It’s fun to dream on the potential of these prospects but most of them will never become impact big leaguers. Does anyone regret giving up Phillips and Lopez for Moustakas? Or Severino for Santana? Even Dubon for Pomeranz was long term negative value, but nobody is clamoring to undo that deal. Sometimes you do a Norris for Olson, but that doesn’t seem to be hurting the Brewers right now

    Ideally you get guys with team control, but there are only so many of those available. And sometimes those years of control end up being meaningless anyway (Schoop, Canha, Bush)

    • Like 1

    Two players would help this team: Orioles first baseman/outfielder Ryan O'Hearn and Twins super utility man Willi Castro. The Cubs have already checked in on Castro, who was a 2024 all-star, but the Brewers could offer more controllable pitching, which the Twins are always looking for. Castro is a more polished hitter than Ortiz and Collins, and, unlike Monasterio, has more than warning track power. O'Hearn could platoon with Vaughn or Hoskins and be a bigger threat than Bauers. 

    • Like 2

    Really would be kinda nice to send Ortiz down to reset.  Cooper Pratt, a month ago, seemed to getting hot, where maybe by now he would be in Nashville, but that hasn't worked out - so he is more than a year away. 

    The move to make would be Turang to short, no?  Just tough in midseason, although with the All Star break here, maybe this is when you would.  Durbin's O has been fine of late, but would sure prefer his arm at 2B than 3B ... 

    Something short term, for a package of the 16th best starter in the system and the 8th best shortstop, or something, is the type of thing I would like.

    45 minutes ago, Brian said:

    f that is all he has so far what else can yo do?

    You... don't use it. Or at least you be honest in your language. Saying "he's never gotten a playoff hit in his whole life!!" is dramatically different than "in the 3 playoff games he didn't get a hit.

    You could take ANY player in the world and find 3 games in a row that they've gone hitless. It's an intellectually dishonest way to make a point.

    • Like 2
    1 minute ago, Team Canada said:

    You could take ANY player in the world and find 3 games in a row that they've gone hitless. It's an intellectually dishonest way to make a point.

    I did not just choose Joey Ortiz worst 3 games of his career,  I used all of his playoff games which is only 3. 

    I then said use all of his 2025 stats.

    Either way Trade Deadline is Thursday, July 31st at 6 p.m. ET, according to MLB.com. This is the final opportunity for MLB teams to trade players during the regular season. 

    • Disagree 1

    I would do Suarez and Naylor for Boeve, Myers and Bitonti without hesitation and feel pretty great about it. BTV would have it as an overpay but I don’t think they are really properly valuing Boeve and Bitonti at this point. 
     

    My values would basically be Suarez (7.3) and Naylor (4.0) for Myers (5.5), Boeve (4.0) and Bitonti (3.0). Which is close enough to even for me to pull the trigger. It would just be such a huge upgrade at the infield corners and allows you to have some flexibility come playoff time. You can platoon Hoskins and Naylor and potentially move Durbin to 2B and Turang to SS if Ortiz is struggling, with Suarez as your everyday 3B. Could also use Hoskins/Naylor at DH or as a PH for playoff games. Can also have Durbin play 3B as a defensive replacement when you’re leading playoff games late as well if  Ortiz is starting and playing well at SS. 

    4 hours ago, Brian said:

    I did not just choose Joey Ortiz worst 3 games of his career,  I used all of his playoff games which is only 3. 

    I fear further attempts to clarify will be as fruitless, but you're really missing the point. 

    1. You are on very flimsy ground attempting to make a point using a 3 game sample. I didn't say you picked his worst three games, I said the entire sample size was 3 games. Whether they are playoff games or not is statistically meaningless. Imagine you said "In April 14-16 2024 Joey couldn't even get a hit!" That's the same thing.

    2. Maybe it wasn't intentional, but I can't imagine how you don't see that saying "in his whole life" is juuust a little misleading when what you really mean is "in 3 games thjs one year." That's different than 15 games across 4 years or whatever. If you present an argument that way, and then someone actually digs in to look at what you are saying by that statement, it's going to immediately discredit what you say.

    • Disagree 1
    8 minutes ago, Schill26 said:

    I would do Suarez and Naylor for Boeve, Myers and Bitonti without hesitation and feel pretty great about it. BTV would have it as an overpay but I don’t think they are really properly valuing Boeve and Bitonti at this point. 
     

    My values would basically be Suarez (7.3) and Naylor (4.0) for Myers (5.5), Boeve (4.0) and Bitonti (3.0). Which is close enough to even for me to pull the trigger. It would just be such a huge upgrade at the infield corners and allows you to have some flexibility come playoff time. You can platoon Hoskins and Naylor and potentially move Durbin to 2B and Turang to SS if Ortiz is struggling, with Suarez as your everyday 3B. Could also use Hoskins/Naylor at DH or as a PH for playoff games. Can also have Durbin play 3B as a defensive replacement when you’re leading playoff games late as well if  Ortiz is starting and playing well at SS. 

    Not sure how they get that value on Myers unless the are looking at reliever projections. ZIPs has him at 1.7 wins per season. Meaning Myers alone is worth more than Suarez and Naylor.

    31 minutes ago, Team Canada said:

    I fear further attempts to clarify will be as fruitless, but you're really missing the point. 

    1. You are on very flimsy ground attempting to make a point using a 3 game sample. I didn't say you picked his worst three games, I said the entire sample size was 3 games. Whether they are playoff games or not is statistically meaningless. Imagine you said "In April 14-16 2024 Joey couldn't even get a hit!" That's the same thing.

    2. Maybe it wasn't intentional, but I can't imagine how you don't see that saying "in his whole life" is juuust a little misleading when what you really mean is "in 3 games thjs one year." That's different than 15 games across 4 years or whatever. If you present an argument that way, and then someone actually digs in to look at what you are saying by that statement, it's going to immediately discredit what you say.

    Bottom Line is: Joey Ortiz is a below average hitter and probably a little above avg fielder no matter how you want to sugar coat him. 

    4 minutes ago, Brian said:

    Bottom Line is: Joey Ortiz is a below average hitter and probably a little above avg fielder no matter how you want to sugar coat him. 

    Over the last two years there are 252 players with at least 500 PA. 

    Ortiz ranks 204th with an 88 wRC+, he ranks 18th in defensive value at +17.7 runs, and his 3.6 WAR is tied for 106th.

    One of the guys he is tied with at 3.6 WAR is fellow infielder Jake Cronenworth who has made $18M the last two years (with another $60M yet to be paid out), versus something like $1.5M for Ortiz. 

    Colt Keith is just below Joey on the leaderboard with 3.5 WAR, he signed a $28.6M extension last year.

    Oft mentioned Brewers trade target Brandon Lowe is just above Joey at 3.7 WAR, but Brandon has made $19.25M the last two years.

    Another infielder just ahead of Joey is Andres Gimenez at 3.8 WAR. He's made $15M the last two years with another $86.5M still on his contract.

    People want to give up value for Ryan McMahon and he's only at 2.7 WAR since 2024 and has cost $24M the last two years with another $32M still pending.

    There is no need to sugar coat anything, Ortiz has produced similar value to a number of well compensated infielders while making league minimum.

    • Like 2
    52 minutes ago, sveumrules said:

    Over the last two years there are 252 players with at least 500 PA. 

    Ortiz ranks 204th with an 88 wRC+, he ranks 18th in defensive value at +17.7 runs, and his 3.6 WAR is tied for 106th.

    One of the guys he is tied with at 3.6 WAR is fellow infielder Jake Cronenworth who has made $18M the last two years (with another $60M yet to be paid out), versus something like $1.5M for Ortiz. 

    Colt Keith is just below Joey on the leaderboard with 3.5 WAR, he signed a $28.6M extension last year.

    Oft mentioned Brewers trade target Brandon Lowe is just above Joey at 3.7 WAR, but Brandon has made $19.25M the last two years.

    Another infielder just ahead of Joey is Andres Gimenez at 3.8 WAR. He's made $15M the last two years with another $86.5M still on his contract.

    People want to give up value for Ryan McMahon and he's only at 2.7 WAR since 2024 and has cost $24M the last two years with another $32M still pending.

    There is no need to sugar coat anything, Ortiz has produced similar value to a number of well compensated infielders while making league minimum.

    I never looked into what he gets paid.  I just said a .205 avg isn't that good. 




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...