Many great jobs? How many everyday taxpayers funding hundreds of millions in tax dollars land a great job at a stadium or basketball arena? This isn't some auto or whatever plant with say 500 to 1000 people or more getting good pay and benefits on a full time job. Most people working inside a stadium or basketball arena are selling concessions, collecting money in the parking lot, scanning tickets, an usher, etc at relatively low pay. They are also even less than a typical part time job. Outside of extra playoff games, it's only 81 games in baseball, 41 in basketball, and 10 in football including two preseason games. Plus, most of the time when states or cities try to lure away a business, it's via some tax breaks, not spending 500 million dollars building them a state of the art new facility, and better jobs come with it than seasonal part time jobs pouring beer and scanning tickets. I fully get that there is also some emotional aspect to sports teams and the sports fans in those cities/states which gets factored in. It just really bothers me at the gall of so many of these very rich sports owners today and their swimming in billions leagues when they ask for new stadiums or arenas, especially given the financial times which so many citizens and cities face. So incredibly tone deaf. Even worse when they try holding a city hostage over a building which isn't falling apart, it's just not making them enough millions compared to fellow owners who more recently blackmailed the city they play in. Jealousy sets in and they think, i want my new free toy also. Out comes the blackmail gun. Rinse and repeat. I won't speak for him, but he may have meant many great jobs during construction. I agree in general though, that taxpayers should not pay for ballparks/stadiums. At least not completely. I can't cite any specific report, but whenever I've seen a stadium economic impact type of study is done (meaning, impact in the community & not just the jobs within the stadium), the finding is that stadia & pro sports franchises do not make a large -- or even positive, relative to the taxpayer expense -- economic impact. It's a bit of a smokescreen imo -- something that sounds like it's probably true, & it's used as an argument literally every time a franchise wants a new stadium. There's definitely an intangible or pride-related value to having a pro sports franchise in your city, but that too often is conflated with economic value when there's debate over a new sports stadium.