I keep seeing these types of comments from many posters, and I'm not sure I see any evidence of it. Who are all of the young/unproven players he hasn't played? A comment he made about Cain, prior to Cain 'proving himself' sticks out to me as an apparent part of Macha's philosophy on young/unproven players: That was from a McCalvy blog post back on July 22d. Hat tip to logan for posting it in the "Mr Cain goes to Milwaukee" thread (post #217), because that was the first correct search result via Google. Macha's instinct was that Cain wouldn't be able to handle MLB pitching, and that it would even go as far as to set back his development. For me, it's not any one specific case, but just an overall opinion that Macha doesn't handle prospects/unproven players well. Maybe he didn't play Gamel for reasons other than he is young and unproven. It's a good point, as is the fact that McGehee was unproven. Perhaps what Macha is more about is 'Are you giving me results right now?', as opposed to, 'Those darn kids!'. That's fine as a managerial philosophy when the goal is to "Just win, baby!", but the Brewers are almost always going to need to be winning as many games as possible while still allowing young players to develop. My concern is a prospect has to be allowed to both succeed & fail, without fearing that his performance tomorrow might cost him his job. My guesses on Escobar are that either Melvin gave an order that Alcides would play fulltime, or that Alcides had already proven himself to Macha last September. With Gamel, no one in the F.O. has seemed concerned about how Gamel was or has been handled, so I think Mat's assumed attitude problem/sense of entitlement is in the mix there. The 'Lucroy called up' thread includes some frustrated posts that he was called up & wasn't getting enough playing time. Once Kottaras slumped, that changed. Lucroy started 4 of his first 12 MLB games; it seemed to take Kottaras going into a mini-slump (1-for-17 from 7.4 - 7.9) for Lucroy to get regular playing time. From 7.10 through the end of July, Lucroy started 15 of 19 games -- right in line with what's regarded as being a regular starter behind the plate. Obviously Lucroy has been the regular catcher since. Imo since Lucroy is a better defender, he's giving Macha good production, hence Jonathan keeping his job despite hitting poorly. Perhaps it was entirely coincidental, and Kottaras just happened to go into a mini-slump right at the moment Macha started to believe Lucroy had soaked in enough of MLB and was ready for more full-time duty. I really have no way of being certain; my thoughts on Macha are just me trying to interpret events. It seemed like Edmonds played ahead of Gomez nearly any time Macha got the chance (feelings on Gomez aside, he needed all the everyday playing time he could get to see how he could develop). Hoffman had to really disprove himself before Axford took over the #1 job in the bullpen. I recall feeling like Braddock wasn't trusted right away after being called up, either (but that could easily just be confirmation bias on my part).