Right. Nobody ever said a hit was as good as a walk. If you have to start talking about specific situations it becomes a much much smaller amount of the time when it makes a difference. Guy on first a single may move him past 2b so it would be the same thing as a walk. Yup, probably about the same. I would look at wOBA though. Player A probably has a bit more value. Not much though since the other guy hits for more power. Again, the type of hits you get matter. BA doesn't tell you anything about that. HR, triples, and doubles are better than singles. Strikeouts matter but they are already taken into account as outs in other stats. An out is an out is an out. I think you would need to change something like 100k into outs in play to make a difference of one run over the course of a season. Again, when evaluating a player you can't look at just specific situations. Look at things on a per team basis and you will see that strikeouts and batting average have almost no correlation at all with runs scored while OBP, SLG and OPS have a much much stronger correlation with runs scored. If you want to continue to look at small samples there is no common ground to discuss this. The eye test should only be used for defense(in conjunction with the stats) and when you don't have a good sample of PA. It has been shown over and over again that a person's observations are usually faulty at best. Please, I beg you to do some reading on statistics. Especially sample sizes. On a per year basis. WARP is a counting stat.