Woodruff Davies Houser Lyles Gonzalez/Nelson Using FIP as the measuring stick, the odd man out is Anderson. His salary gets allocated toward Lyles/Gonzalez. Gonzalez actually pitched better in innings 4-6 than 1-3, and the 2nd/3rd time facing a batter than the 1st; his struggles were in the 1st/2nd inning. As for Houser, digging behind the numbers a bit: 1st half: 19 G, 5 starts, 42.2 IP, 2.4 K/BB, .796 OPS-A, .346 BABIP, 1.453 WHIP 2nd half: 16 G, 13 starts, 68.2 IP, 3.89 K/BB, .656 OPS-A, .279 BABIP, 1.107 WHIP The numbers suggest that he was better in the 2nd half primarily as a starter - and better when he had a defined role as a starter - than he was primarily as a reliever in the 1st half (and bouncing back and forth between the pen and starting). Only 5 IP as a reliever in the 2nd half (with 2 ER, 1 HR given up), so the vast majority of the 2nd half numbers above were as a starter. Given that Houser is pre-arby, I think they have to roll with him so that they can invest their resources in bringing back Moose/Grandal and/or upgrading SS.