endaround

Sounds like a lot of the technical crew are contractors and not employees with on air talent sometimes being employed by the teams themselves. The actual equipment maybe leased.

Because he played in 67 games in 2021 and 98 games in 2022. So yes he'll be available for $5 million if he has a season ending injury this year in the next month.

$5 million per year? Anderson is an above average 3B or an above average RF if healthy. Anderson should get at least 2 years $22 million with a 3rd year option.

Owen Miller 1st 104 PAs in 2022: .311/.375/.533 wRC+155 Owen Miller after 472 PAs in 2022: .243/.301/.351 wRC+ 85 Owen Miller after 109 PAs in 2023: .346/.367/.548 wRC+147

The Brewers were even in better shape on July 30, 2022.

The size is also why it is very questionable if baseball will work in Las Vegas. Even assuming they can get visiting crowds to come in for the stadium, baseball makes its money from local tv deals. The Las Vegas population is on par with Pittsburgh. And there really is no one in Nevada outside of Las Vegas. So where is the revenue going to come from?

Joey Gallo

Ripping the player to hide the fact he never should have been sent down 4-1 in the 7th

Not really, but the differences at 1B and 3B are huge. They make up for the better Brewer starting pitching.

The CBT is a de facto salary cap which has kept down salaries and yet here we are again talking about transferring more money from players to owners. Salary caps do not increase competition, they only limit player earnings. And the Rays are not a small market team. They are a low revenue team in a rather large market.

That is not the issue, the issue is that added year is just not worth that much if they are 2-3 win players.

Looking at the above, it would be lucky if the Packers got pocket lint.

The Brewers have 4 OF prospects for 2 positions (I don't wan to address Yelich here, but my opinion is you keep in the OF since his bat is fine there and will not be fine for 1B or DH but that is another topic). The Brewers need to find out who is going to make it and if they need to trade someone. You right now have the perfect opportunity to evaluate a player. Use it. Part of this is I think people are really too high on Frelick, Mitchell, and Wiemer. They could break out, but to me they all look like 2-3 win players. None of the three are also that young that we can expect huge growth going forward. We just traded the last arby year on a 2-3 win OFer for spare parts.

There is a lot of wish casting on this forum of the Brewers getting in high contact, high average, and low K players. This is not a new thing (Luis Urias was going to be new model of Brewer player who hits .300 and doesn't strike out!). But that isn't what is happening. Frelick is that, but those others are not. Mitchell and Wiemer are high K players likely with K rates near 30% or even higher. Wiemer may bring his down to mid 20s. Contreas is a pretty high K player as well, with a K rate above 25%. Turang is a low average moderate K player though his K rate of near 20% in AAA main mean a higher rate in MLB.

Looking at the bottom of the Brewer WAR list populated by "the next big thing". Hey, Ramon Flores is still around!

The decision is not Frelick vs Taylor. Its Frelick Vs Taylor vs Wiemer (maybe vs Mitchell). That is a lot more complicated. Wiemer hit nearly as well as Frelick in August and September in AAA without having to have really high BA. Wiemer: August .276/.319/.552 September .302/.425/.476 Frelick: August .376/.453/.462 September .354/.417/.554 It would be nice to see Frelick handed splits past A but milb.com still has issues. Wiemer has more outfield experience. Wiemer is also a year older so service time issues are less of concerns and repeating AAA is a bigger hit to his value. He also has enormous power. Now Frelick does project as a better hitter in most systems than Wiemer but that is likely due to Wiemer's bad results from AA as he was trying recover from injury. Going with the more prototypical corner outfielder in Wiemer may be a less risky decision.

OK. These both have to do with contract status in the future. To reach free agency a player needs a full 6 years of service time. If they end their six major league season with a full 6 years they are a free agent for the next season. If however, they end with 5.9 years, they are still under control of the current club in the arbitration process. A full season of credit is less than a full season (i.e. you can't just hold a player back for 1 game to prevent a full season of service) but 2 to 3 weeks should cover it (I don't remember the exact days anymore). Super 2 deals with arbitration. Typically a player requires 3 years of service to enter arbitration, but unlike free agency there is not a fixed set of time needed. Players with close to 3 years of service time after their third season will be eligible for arbitration, hence they are "Super 2" since they have less than 3 years. The cutoff date varies based upon the service time of all players in the class. Its usually about mid June but can be a week or two later so July 1st is usually safe. What does this mean then for a player? A player debuting in late April 2023 and then remaining in MLB would be under fixed contracts for 2023, 2024, and 2025. He would be arbitration eligible for 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029 becoming a free agent for 2030. Arbitration salaries tend to go 20%, 40%, 60% and 80% of free agent value so the fourth year can get costly for a really good player but its still discounted. A player debuting in July 2023 and then remaining in MLB would be under fixed contracts for 2023, 2024, 2025, and 2026. He would be arbitration eligible for 2027, 2028, and 2029 becoming a free agent for 2030. So by keeping a player down for 2.5 more months you reduce the number of arbitration years. What a team should do is really dependent on the projection for the player, if the team is currently competing and the replacements they have. Given the Brewers hope to compete it is likely more advantageous not to wait for Super 2 if they believe the prospect is significantly better than the alternative. The new ROY changes to the CBA can cause all of these calculations to fly out with players potentially receiving a full year of service time regardless of debut date. ROY is a weird vote since winners can go from solid starters to MVP level candidates. So someone like Frelick who could hit for high average or steal dozens of bases might not win a ROY but could find himself on lots of ballots in 2nd and 3rd place.

Super 2 is different than an additional year. Super 2 just makes it one less year of arbitration ( 3 instead of 4) but at the cost of close to a half season of playing time. The difference between mid April and the beginning of July.

Josh McDaniel wants his QB to buy him another 5 years of development while he once again proves he's over his head. So unless Brady goes to Vegas, they are going to develop a guy. The roster is bad and little draft capital to make it better.

The Brewers need RH platoon players for both 1B and DH. That is Hiura and Brosseau right now. The Brewers likely do not believe in reverse splits.

Hey the Brewers signed a guy who projects to be about league average with the bat! What a surprise! As for splits, I guarantee the Brewers do not believe in reverse splits hence how Hiura was used. I expect Anderson to basically be the full time 3B.

Does Hegan's 1969 count as a Brewer? I mean yes but also maybe not?

Not sure why having a 2B precludes getting a 3B

Who could the Brewers have gotten? Well the Twins traded Urshela for a 19 year old 40 grade pitching prospect.

Tellez Steamer projection: wRC+ 123. Basically his power remains but his BABIP gets back to a decent .258 instead of .215. Abreau wRC+ 126 Bell wRC+ 123 The free agent that makes the most sense at this point is Contreras. Turner also makes sense but little chance he leaves LA.