As much as I tend to lean strongly offense-first as far as players that I prefer, I would have been in favor of a really good defensive SS, even if the guy couldn't hit. The whole "the rest of the lineup can hit, so who cares?" stance makes more sense if the guy can really pick it. Strong defense up the middle is one of the few baseball cliches I actually believe in, and the 2011 Brewers don't have it aside from in CF. If you look at 2008, the team had Hardy, Cameron, and Kendall - who was really great at throwing out runners that season. It also helps that two of those guys were head and shoulders better offensive players than the current guys manning those positions. Anyhow, I think the thing that people trying to defend Betancourt are missing when it comes to the thoughts from the other side is that I don't think anyone who thinks Betancourt is a bad defensive player is basing that off of the 13 games or whatever he has played with the Brewers. It's based on years of data and also years of scouts and whatnot saying he is clearly not a good defender.