I think #2 is an awful idea. This is the only thing that allows small market clubs like the Brewers to succeed. There is no way we could afford to pay market value for JJ, Rickie, Prince, Hart, Yovanni, Manny and Villanueva. I like the arbitration system as I feel it makes players go year to year and really earn there keep (at least in those first 6 years). If I originally had included the note that I don't agree with paying market value, would that change your interpretation of my suggestion? Using real generic figures, my problem is spending "only" $6Million combined on the aforementioned JJ, Rickie, Prince, Hart, Yovanni, Manny and Villanueva; and the "market" dictating $10Million for Gagne alone. I'm not suggesting spending more, but distributing more appropriately based upon performance, not tenure. Even if he had regained his Cy Young form, is Gagne's worth to any team 15 times greater than Fielder's, cuz that's what their 2008 salaries would indicate?