This whole Deadspin / Dan Le Betard thing is just comedic to me. I think it is awesome what he did. And now the BBWAA banned him from future votes. Quite frankly, I would rather use the folks of this site to choose whether or not a person goes into the hall of fame than current process used with the BBWAA. Part of an article by Bruce Hooley from ESPN Cleveland is laughable "reporters who cover the game on a daily basis are better informed than fans who follow the sport from afar." ... But where does it say anywhere that the 571 members of the BBWAA are required to watch X amount of games per year? It doesn't, half of these guys casually watch the sport anyhow. Some of the guys don't even cover the sport anymore! But hey, they get a vote. Furthermore, I believe those writers have become distanced from understanding impact vs non impact players. I would guess that half of them don't even have a rudimentary understanding of sabermetrics. To me, guys who dominated over a long enough period of time should be in and it shouldn't be such a hard argument. I just don't see how players like Don Mattingly, Curt Schilling, Mike Mussina, Tim Raines, Kenny Lofton, Mike Piazza are viewed as just "good" players. These guys dominated their sport for an extended period of time and were routinely in the discussion as being one of the best players in their sport at the time they played. To me, fixing of the process is either you are in or you are not. This whole 15 year voting thing is idiotic. A player could conceivably get 75% of all the writers to vote for him, but if it doesn't happen in the exact same year, they are not in. And even waiting the 5 years after a player is done is ridiculous. I think waiting is a bad idea as time allows you to forget their impact. Take a guy like Justin Verlander. He should be a shoe in for the hall, but when the time comes- my guess is he won't be. Even though Verlander has been MVP, CY Young winner ... whatever. 5 years after he is done playing, it will be forgotten and will just be another guy not in the hall. 23 people didn't vote for Willie Mays. Do those 23 people honestly think he should be kicked out? I would guess not. They just didn't vote for him as they were peeved from a prior year vote or wanted to max their votes on other people knowing he was going to make it anyhow. So why not just say yay or nay?