It's not always so black and white. As a criminal defense attorney, I can tell you that I have had big cases, where people enter a plea to something less so as to avoid the unknown or losing a trial on something bigger. Often times, cases are resolved based upon the perceived "certainty" of a plea deal vs the uncertainty of trial. I can also tell you that this "not being able to play MLB" would fall as a collateral consequence to his conviction - not unlike someone losing their right to own a firearm after a felony conviction, and that upon being advised of said collateral consequence during a plea colloquy that clients have balked at entering a plea and negotiations are restarted to avoid that charge/plea and that collateral consequence...because its not really about the truth or fairness, its about convictions for the State and avoiding an undersireable punishment for defendants. I would not be at all surprised if all parties, including the State, went back in time and advised that this collateral consequence would be out there, that a different deal would have been made. On top of that, because juvie records are sealed, it should not have gotten out to begin with and that is always taken into consideration in juvie deals as well. The entire case sounds like a headache for the Brewers or any MLB team so best to avoid, but it isnt black and white, I can assure you that.