So what your saying is that if you only look at LOSING games, the Brewers offense doesn't do well? You do realize that if you THINK about it, that's what you would expect because THEY LOST THOSE GAMES!!@!@! If you only look at the games the Brewers WON, you're going to find an offense that's near top of the league. Does that make the offense great? No, because you count the losses too... The Brewers have the 3rd best record in the NL and are 7ish games ahead of the 2nd place team. That means they're doing a lot more right than wrong. I bet if you looked at the games the Brewers don't score at all, they never win!!!! Can you make any other conclusions based on a few outlier games? NOPE... No, what I was saying is that the Brewers have been losing games much more because of poor offense than because of poor pitching. Scores of 2-0, 4-2, 4-3, 2-0, 4-3, 3-1, 5-2, and 6-3 would bear that out. It’s not like the pitching is falling apart and they’re losing games 9-8. When you only allow 30 runs in 8 games you should expect to win a couple. One stat that really jumps out at me is that the Brewers are 11-9 in games in which they have allowed exactly 2 runs. Across the whole league, teams are winning about 75% of games in which they allow 2 runs. In other words, the Brewers have an unusually high number of 2-0 and 2-1 losses, evidence that they have squandered too many well pitched games. The Brewers record establishes that they are doing more right than wrong. But that doesn’t mean it can’t be better. And one of the obvious ways it could be better is to take better advantage of the excellent pitching by cutting down on those games of scoring 2 runs or less.