I guess I find it a tad different when in college football you rarely, if ever, play other Top 5 or even Top 10 teams during the regular season. It isn't like in college basketball where we see all those Top 10 teams play each other constantly, especially out of conference. For instance Kansas will play Michigan State, Tennessee, Kentucky, and Villanova out of their conference for basketball. I can see after winning most of those games why someone would be a little annoyed they have to play garbage teams risking their chance at the title come March. I think that is something the current system really doesn't appreciate therefor teams just load up their non conference slate with garbage and/or good, but not great teams. With the lack of games they play is that something they could effectively encourage to outweigh the risk of scheduling it and losing? Not sure. I could see the argument for 6 teams as I don't really want to see 3 loss teams have a shot (which an 8 team bracket could cause, but I have no problem with 2 loss teams with a bunch of quality wins having a chance.