At the same time this post attempts to put light on the trade, it shows the negative to me in the trade. Rodgers is a year older, obviously collar bone fragile. His window is shorter and shorter too. Adding the guessed 90grade talent may be a year too late. And thats hopeful the return pick is top 15. This isnt TT's draft. We dont need to pile in 7+ picks next season when we have 12 this year. We reduced our draft dropping 4, and replacing a 3rd with a 5th. It's tiresome running out there a dozen late 4th rd-undrafted FAs to compete within the division drafting top 20s so often. Need top 60guys now, not next season. Exactly, they should have stayed put and had their pick of Edmunds or James. IMO neither will disappoint, not so sure about Alexander. I understand the need for CB, but Jackson and Oliver are still there, trade up in the 2nd for one of them. They will both be better pros then Alexander will be. There's a reason James and Edmunds fell. Looking back at history, hyped defensive guys that tumbled rarely end up making much of a splash in the league. Typically a case of GMs knowing more than fans and draft "experts". Personally, I would have been excited with either of those guys, but if the Packers had similar grades on James, Edmunds and Alexander, they 100% did the right thing by collecting an extra 1st and getting Alexander. I know you shouldn't draft for need in many cases, but CB is a much bigger need position than safety or ILB.