I see many mocks advocating for the Packers to draft Harold Landry, the edge rusher from Boston College. I only have one response to that: Carl Bradford. They are extremely similar players measurable-wise (Landry has a bit longer arms), and both were very productive as collegiate pass rushers. The Packers soon found out that Bradford was too small and not a good enough athlete to be an effective edge rusher in the NFL, and since cutting him, he has kicked around several practice squads and is close to washing out of the league. Landry was more productive in college, and is predicted to go much higher than Bradford as a mid-1st rounder. However, whoever drafts him I predict will eventually come to the same conclusion that the Packers did with Bradford. If he's the Packers' pick at 14, it would be a HUGE mistake. I think the Packers are keyed in on taking one of the 3 top DBs in the draft (Ward, Fitzpatrick or James). Ward would be your more-prototypical perimeter CB, while James is an athletic safety (think Nick Collins) while Fitzpatrick is a hybrid of the two, profiling as a more talented, smarter Demarious Randall. I heard rumblings this morning that they are talking to the Raiders about possibly trading up to #10 to better assure that one of those guys will still be there. If they don't trade up, I predict they trade down to a little later in the 1st round, and grab some more solid capital in the process. The boards aren't really falling great for them right now if they stay at 14. I think they could trade down to the mid-20s and still grab a guy like Davenport. Like I mentioned a few days ago, the Pats want a QB, and their two 1st rounders are very much in play. If one of the top 4 QBs drops, or if the Pats are that enamored with Lamar Jackson, there could be a deal there.