Let me guess, the hosts basically boiled their argument down to: "Bud is an evil commissioner who allowed steroids to run rampant", right?Yep, pretty much. One of the two goes on rants about Selig relatively often, and so when this news came over the wire, they were having kinda a laugh about it and wanted to bring TH on to find out "what the heck Milwaukee is thinking" (to paraphrase). It especially ticks me off because he never rants anywhere near as much about the well-documented steroids issue that was borne out of the Bay Area. It almost seemed like he was backtracking with TH a bit yesterday--"I just want him to take some responsibility, but he lies and says that he had no idea,"--when usually he leans so hard on Selig you'd think he was the only responsible party. TH acquitted himself well, I thought: discussing Don Fehr and the union as well as Selig's accomplishments as owner and commissioner. I also think TH feels like I do: Bud may be a schlub, but he's our schlub, so back off. [The radio show guys out here, for what it's worth, tried to make it seem like TH was defending him because him and Selig were personal buddies.] To expand on that, I'm not a big Selig fan, but I can respect what he did to bring baseball here and I can respect what I think has been an under-rated job as commissioner. I have no problem with the statue.