So if the major league minimum were $45,000 then should Happy have to pay the player for the autograph that he was requesting on the ball he wanted in exchange? Look, as pathetic as it may seem to some, nobody here is getting down on Happy for being a ballhawk. We all have weird hobbies that appeal to mostly ourselves. That clearly is not the issue here. The issue is that this was a story carried by the AP, SportsCenter, etc about a fan that was a bit out of place in treating this rookie's HR as if it were a ball that belonged in the Hall of Fame. I read Happy's blog, and when the Marlins employee came out to his seat with a bat from Coghlan that should have been it. The phrase "act like you've been there before" springs to mind, especially since Happy does this stuff every game. The issue here isnt ball hawking, it is the ransom asked for by the fan.