BrewerFan

Damn...I didn't even think about this. This was a big enough problem as it stood, but...this will be devastating for some programs that are struggling to compete financially as it is. The gap between the top programs and the rest is going to be that much more pronounced in those non-revenue sports...and it's going to be pretty pronounced in the revenue sports.

This is exactly what I'd do. And I could see that team having a Reds like season(I think the Reds will fade, but they've certainly got their fan base excited). I'm taking it a step further with regard to Yelich, but...my opinion has already been rebuffed on here with regard to that, so...I'll let that go😏

That's an interesting idea. I'd need Seattle to take on 50M of that though. At that point, is it really worth it? He won't be back 100% likely until '25. That'd give you two years... That'd be kinda planning for year 2 of Chourio, Black, 3 of Frelick, Wiemer...etc... But is Seattle gonna pay 50M to let him walk? I don't know...maybe Seattle wants to go all in on Ohtani and stay out of the luxury tax next year and the Brewers take his salary next year and the Mariners pay it the following two years? I'm not a particular fan of France. I think you've got a better version of him in Black. You're not getting a big defensive upgrade from France to Black, so...just roll with Black.

I think you're a little off the mark with some of this. I'm as big of a Hiura defender as there is on here, BUT we should keep in mind...he was bad in Sept. He got regular ABs and he struggled. It feels like a lot of people arguing against Hiura getting ABs aren't doing so in good faith, so lets be honest. He was hitting the ball HARD...when he hit it and he went into a prolonged slump. It's ALSO true that he was poorly handled when he was hitting well in that he'd be benched the day after a 2-4 with a big HR. Toro...he has an exceptionally small sample size and a 3 hit game that I don't really think is all that significant. Who do you think we should have sent down instead of him? Adames-He's a Gold Glove caliber SS, he's kinda the heart of the team and there's nobody close to pushing him at SS. And I say that as a fan who's much higher on Turang than most others(I've said I think he's a Trea Turner-ish type player). But then you're scrambling to fill 2B. You COULD put Monastario there with Anderson at 3B and Santana, but Adames has a history and has earned the chance to be in there everyday. That said, they HAVE been sitting Willy more. I think he's just pressing, but I'd still start him everyday personally. I think you're connecting some things that aren't necessarily related. I also feel like questioning this puts you in the "anti-FO" group by some and they get a bit overly defensive(which is much why this is 14 pages long as those of us who want to see Hiura). The FO doesn't always get it right. They're not infallible. They make poor decisions. DFA Aguilar and Choi are two examples, but...just because they're generally run well doesn't mean they can't be wrong here or that you cant' question it.

Urias-Injured Adames-Still playing everyday Rowdy-Injured+still playing everyday when not on the IL(though still injured if you believe the forearm issue). Taylor-Injured+still playing regularly This argument would be exponentially more valid if the Brewers had given Hiura at bats and THEN he struggled, went down to AAA and people were asking why he's not getting ANOTHER chance. But that you just cited 4 players who the Brewers gave ample opportunity to seems to contradict the point you were making. And you will I'm sure reply by citing the defensive versatility those players provide(sans Rowdy, but the other 3 are either versatile or in Willy's case, elite). And then I'd point out we're talking about having him DH or play 1B where Rowdy isn't exactly Keith Hernandez himself.

Ahhh...THAT could make a lot of sense then. So they can give this guy half his salary, put him on the 40 and they'd have the ability to send him up and down? If that's the case, that'd just...completely change the level of annoyance I have when I think about him in AAA. That would make a lot more sense...I mean, it still doesn't seem like the confidence in Hiura overfloweth...ok.

Yeah, this is all just silly. There have been so many times we've put Winker out there or Tellez with a two month run of a .450 OPS or whatever. You're not bringing him back unless he earns a spot with the Brewers. They're not going through arbitration and paying him...probably a modest raise to ~3M unless you plan on playing him and why would they if they haven't this year when he's been in AAA when we've been just brutal at the plate. I guess it'll just be a emergency option if Canha gets hurt+Winker DFAed(which has to happen) and then Tellez keeps struggling or...who even knows by this point. But I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if Hiura puts a .250/.330/.440 line next year wherever he goes.

Just...swap out Chicago for Gotham.

You combine all that with the fact that he DID change his swing and this is a guy who had a 60 grade hit tool and performed at a very high level already at the MLB level. There was a time when it was so stupid obvious...before the deadline, Winker at a ~560 OPS, Tellez with that OPS in the ~400 or 450 range over a couple month period. There was just no reason to not give him a chance(irrespective of the fact that he was DFAed and not claimed, that's not a permanent excuse to do nothing when you've got an OPS 60 points below the 2nd worst team at the very "position" Hiura would be playing). And this is a team who is CONSTANTLY taking players with his type of history and picking them up on the cheap, trying to see if they can get that version of them back. But when we have one of our own, literally no downside to giving him playing time other than if it doesnt' work, he's not on your AAA team to help out in the playoffs, they leave him down there.

No, you really didn't. I think anyone not being obstinate understood what you were saying...even if they disagreed.

I guess my view is antiquated. I thought you wanted a full year in AA for the elite prospects, but after they moved Black up and then everyone else at AAA last year(Mitchell, Wiemer, Frelick)...that's just not the norm. And nothing is the norm for Chourio. What do we do when he hits .350/.410/.700 at AAA though? Gonna be hard to leave him down until June next year!

I also have gotten the impression that Eppler isn't going anywhere. He's a year removed from a 100+ win team. They just had a bad year. They had fluke injuries and they relied on old pitchers, but...why wouldn't you think Verlander and Scherzer would pitch well this year? I'm definitely worried that Stearns is going to take some guys with him. Not multiple executives, but obsessing over who exactly leaves is pointless. And you don't build a farm system like this with just ONE guy. They're now an infrastructure in place. We can thank Stearns for much of that, Attanasio for investing in it, but I don't believe it's so fragile, it won't survive the New York Mets.

No...he's not. What he's going to do is stay here and secretly work for the Mets and his good buddy David Stearns. Just don't be surprised when Chourio is traded for Vogelbach(might even throw in Quero). We've already established Cohen is paying 20M for Stearns and 10M for Arnold and Johnson!

His OPS is under .600 with the Brewers(as is Santana's). How much time are we gonna give these guys!

I don't know...if this is a "get off my lawn," type curmudgeonly take! I don't like it myself...but I guess I'm starting to get old. I loved watching CFB coming up. ND vs FSU and FSU vs Miami, those giant non-conference games that would decide the winner, but still having the 5 conferences and the big Bowl games. I definitely preferred the old way. The chance for Boise State to get in there vs an Oklahoma or Cincy. I wonder if this was inevitable or if it was kinda spurred on by Ed O'bannon and the NIL lawsuits and rulings? Eh, whatever. We got Fickell, Longo and Wisconsin is suddenly a "cool," place to go!

I think that's all pretty accurate. It really does suck to think about the Humphrey vs Myers pick. It was a head scratcher at the time, but so have other Packers picks(Reed for instance or Rashan Gary for many). But man, that one hurts in retrospect. It's not even like drafting Sternberger a pick or two ahead of McClaurin, it's passing on the consensus #1 Center who was projected as high as a late 1st and taking a guy who was mocked much further down. That said, I'll trust the Packers as they really do draft well(particularly if you ignore the 3rd round). But Myers has looked like a miss for a while now. I'd just trust Stenovich and company, but this is the same group that inexplicably started Turner and Kelly when Nijman had been playing well, that started the year with Newman getting snaps. There have been a couple of situations they've been slow to act. I hope that's not the case here and Myers has a full season and with Jenkins and JRJ being as assignment solid a Guard combo as you can get, he'll start to play better...but I'm skeptical and that's without accounting for the bad snaps. I like Tyler Goodson. He checks almost every box. He has great speed, he makes the right reads(which is an issue Dillon has, though he looked good last night). The only issue is he is taken down by arm tackles that Aaron Jones just runs right through. That's a part of Jones game that's wildly underrated. His power running. He's not Derek Henry, but for a little guy, he runs with a wide base and keeps those legs moving. Now, this part, I've got to remind myself the defense is always ahead of the offense in 11 on 11's and no OL grouping is going to play well when they're rotating in and out, BUT...the IOL didn't look good. Didn't look like they were passing off their men well at all. There was one play where Karl Brooks came off a stunt and you had 3 to block 2 and the LG(not sure who it was) but he picked up Brooks late and Brooks just walked him into Clifford. On Brooks is part, it was a really well executed stunt. He disengaged and showed a great burst, but I THINK it was Newman, he was just on his heels. That said, Brooks looked like he has a real burst and I saw at least one play where Wooden really flashed as well. The DL was constantly re-setting the OL as well. Which again, early in camp, no Bakh, no Jenkins and on the other side, only Gary wasn't playing, so it's to be expected. As a result of things like that, it's hard to really get a read for the QB play. It's not hard to get an read on the type of arm Love has or how smooth and easy Musgrave moves, how dynamic the young WRers look. Without context, it's easy to feel more pessimistic about this offense after this Family Night, but then you just need to go back to Family Night a year ago and Rodgers and this offense weren't really moving the ball, they looked disjointed. So I'm trying to focus less on the fact that it seemed like the QB would have been hit or disrupted on every other throw and more focused on the throws and ball placement...and that looked good. I am loving Musgrave and Reed in particular getting into it with Rasul Douglas and Jaire talking a little #%it to the WRers. It shows the rookies aren't intimidated and it shows the defense is not just counting the minutes during practice. They're really using this time to get better. Jaire is such a game changer. If I had to pick a "player of the night," or something corny like that, I'd have Carlson in there with his leg in front of 73K. That should quell some fears for a while. I'd have Mason on standby in case this team is good all the same, but great night from him. The DL/OLBers looked explosive. I think Slaton has a breakout year. We said this last year, but I think it's coming. Watson, and the backup OTs Jones and Walker looked good, Van Ness looks like a young Rashan Gary(in that he's limited, strong as an ox, uses pretty much just a bull rush and hustles). But Musgraves. What he did to Savage was....savage. He should be beating Savage on contested balls. And I understand Savage isn't Ed Reed, but he can cover from the slot. But when Musgrave put that shake on him at the top of his route and Savage went to the ground? DAMN that was dirty. That's the NFL's version of Trae Young crossing a guy over, putting him on his rear, then looking down at him, giving the little shoulder shimmy and draining the 3. He could be one of those immediate impact players, and if he stays healthy...our first real threat since Finley? Jimmy Graham had a couple of productive years(overpaid, but productive). Tonyan was ultimately a disappointment, but had one big year. Musgrave looks like a totally different animal. He does look particularly soft in the blocking game, so he has a lot of room to go there, but the Packers are talking about how he's one of the FASTEST players on the team? I remember people saying he was disappointed in his 40 and all that, but, it's the Football speed. He's just smooth. He looks like Mike Cameron in CF chasing down a Fly Ball and just gliding. I think a personnel grouping with Watson, Musgraves, Doubs, Jones and then you could put Reed in there, Goodson as a Tyler Ervin type role, Dillon and have him serve as a lead blocker on occasion(as they did last year and was pretty effective). But all of those are going to open Musgraves up down the seem. Rodgers did not like throwing the ball over the middle, but I think that could open up the whole defense. If our starting secondary, assuming Stokes was healthy, matched up vs this receiving core, I think it'd be pretty interesting. Stokes-Watson(I'm just going speed and size and Stokes rookie year). Jaire-Doubs(Doubs is a better route runner with deceptive speed). Douglas- Reed? Musgrave-Nixon or Douglas? Those guys are problems if they're healthy. If a team like KC plays Love the way they did in his first start...well, I don't think they'll stay in that coverage real long!

He looked outstanding tonight. He has a massive leg, easy power from 50+. They looked pretty true off his foot. But to your second point, I'm not sure we learn all that much about even Carlson. We likely don't until the season starts. I thought Wyatt looked incredible tonight. Brooks looked good as well. Clark is still miscast as a DE in the 3-4. His first step as a NT is what made him special. He's just eating up blocks at DE or the 3. Let Slaton do that. You're trying to either beat your man or occupy blockers to keep the LBers clean. Clarks worst performances has come at DE. Van Ness looks the part physically. He blew up a couple plays. Musgrave moves sooo smooth and could be a big deal down the seem. ---That's about all I saw and I don't know how much of it is new information. He stated explicitly he wasn't planning on playing in NY with the Jets. And he still looks small. I imagine this will be a 3-4 year transition before he's fully complete, but he was very solid last year, so...15 pounds(and it's obvious it's not just from eating at Culvers every day) should help quite a bit. I think he MAY be the most likely player to become an AP among these young guys(though it'll be that much tougher at LT).

Yeah, probably not...but I'm a fan. I think he'll be an excellent match with the young OFers we have. Good plate discipline, good hit tool...but not particularly young and very little power. Also, not really a priority given we've got an abundance of OFers capable of playing CF. I'd say Cam Devanney given his ability to play an elite SS or 3B and despite about as bad of a pro start as you could have had, he's just getting better at AAA. I thought they should have protected him last year, but not sure he was all that close to being drafted give the number of players left unprotected.

Yeah, you're going in a very different direction than me. If they did this, I'd be alright with them keeping Burnes and just getting the QO for the two pitchers and maybe Adames if Woody didn't score. This would require a heavy investment in the payroll though. I got about 100M with Yelly, Woodruff, Adames, Eloy, Hoskins, Chaffin and Canelario...but also a really young team and a lot of pre-arb players, so it's possible. I'd take that LAD deal in a heartbeat with any of those starters, but I think you might be getting back more for Williams than Burnes. That's a LOT of talent(I know it's one of those starters). LOL...the Padres are the only option. They need to replace Hader, right? Give us Lesko and Snelling! No Chourio for you? Another year yet?

Another great Greinke story... Upon being called up to the Majors(to pitch...much to his chagrin). How can you not love this guy? I also remember the quote about how he likes Milwaukee so far. It was something like, "I like it so far....nobody's been annoying me or anything."

“I like hitting. I’d rather go back and play a position if I was allowed to. But I’m better at pitching. So, people have me pitch.”

Turang DID hit in the minors. Turang was also selected as a Prep Short Stop, not a College OFer. He missed 2020...which was a huge year for his development, then was pushed from A Ball at 19 to AA/AAA at 21 after the Covid year. Turang -games at 21/22 years old in 190 AAA games .279/.365/.404 .769 OPS Adames- 21 and 22 years old in 196 AAA games .280/.359/.417 .777 OPS That's not to suggest anyone expects him to be the offensive player Adames was. They've got very different profiles. Adames projected to be a power hitter...and he has been. Turang projected to hit for average and draw walks. We should also keep in mind when we acquired Adames, he had a OPS+ of 74. Turang this year has an OPS+ of 71. The sky is not falling because a ROOKIE SS is not hitting at 23 years old. But more importantly; This isn't an issue of WANT. I'd want Adames to stick around at SS for the next 4-5 years and Turang at 2B. I suppose Adames is making an extension more plausible this year with a .205 BA and a .675 OPS, but he's a guy who projected to get a Dansby Swanson type contract coming into the year and is set to be a FA in a little over a year. So it has literally nothing to do with wanting Turang over Adames. I think we'd all be thrilled if the Brewers had the money where they could keep Turang at 2B, but that's unlikely. He'll almost certainly be the Starting SS in '25 or the '24 trade deadline.

Tom was just impressive. He looked so small last year, but he has such great feet and moves so well that it provides such a wide range of potential outcomes. I could very easily see him becoming an All-Pro at LT, Center. I don't think he looks like a dominant G as he's not a real mauler, but he looks like a guy you can plug in anywhere. The clearest sign the Packers had confidence in that offensive line was the draft. When have the Packers NOT taken at last a couple OL? It's a deep group and what little we saw from Jones and Walker was impressive. I think both have the potential to be valuable players so long as they manage their bodies well. Another part of that was Gutekunst saying the Offensive linemen they really liked were "off the board by our pick," so that suggests that Skoronski, Wright and obviously Johnson Jr were possible picks. Next years draft class may be one of the best for LT prospects atop the board in a long time. Fashanu from PSU, Alt from ND are two guys who look like top 10 picks, but then J.C Latham was a top 3 overall recruit and could move up quickly. Another guy who I think is a bit under the radar, but the kid who transferred from Oregon to BYU Kinsley Suamatia. 6'6 330, really good athlete. A little Lane Johnson to him...though not as good of an athlete(or he'd be higher). Just another reason why this is SUCH a massive season for Jordan Love and the Packers. If he proves he can be a good NFL starter, the Packers can really double down on the trenches. Add a young LT, hopefully another DL like Maason Smith from LSU and build this team like Philly and SF vs having to go out and use draft capital on a QB. Love has a chance to make Gutekunst look like an absolute genius or a donkey. If Love plays well, it doesn't matter if Rodgers wins the MVP, we got our guy. If Love doesn't, we have to start over again and people are going to constantly compare his numbers to Rodgers.

Is he still taking any snaps at Center? That feels like the Packers weak spot on offense outside of the unknowns. By Myers is physical and a mauler, he's just not very quick. Rhyan was an exceptional athlete, Tom even better. That's such an important position in this scheme...I'd love to see an upgrade there. Hopefully it'll come from more consistent play by Myers along with having Jenkins and JRJ working together, but that's been a problem.

LOL...that's a nice way of saying you think the rest of the idea is silly! 'I like that one very small part of that long, ridiculous and incredibly unlikely off-season plan you had.' 🤣😂 Lets just stick with the Rangers and Brewers. Is the idea of packaging Burnes and Williams crazy to you? I kinda struggle with the idea that a team is gonna trade us a top ~45 pitching prospect for one year of Burnes. This is without all the talent from the draft included, but a guy White who has a big fastball, and the potential for a full 4 pitch repertoire, it seems unlikely. If you tack on a lock down closer? And we are at that point with Williams where we'll have two years left after this year. So if you trade Burnes, I feel like that makes it a much easier sell to get that top prospect and then a couple other arms.