Very well said, rwa. I've been saying for a while that the definition of madness is "doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result." If the past 12 (or however many) players failed to have their suspensions overturned, why would it have made sense for Braun to use the same failed arguments? I still believe that Braun did not cheat, and I don't believe Laurenzi sabotaged him either. I think something weird happened with the sample or the testing to cause the positive result. What that is, we may never know. At this point, it isn't really productive to worry about it.