People opposed to the quarantine love to quote statistics like this, and in my view, it's as apples-to-oranges and as irresponsible to cite as the deaths relative to 9/11 is. It's not a great comparison, not one I would use. But the fact that most people would agree that we can't close the country for a month to save 10 people is proof in itself that lives do in fact have a price. The debate over that price is a fair one, but there is a price and that conversation is already taking place. I don't disagree with the premise of your thought process at all (though again, I disagree with that specific analogy's use here). What I disagree with is the apparent belief by some that those considerations aren't being factored into these decisions already. Of course those things have been discussed and weighed at the highest levels of decision making, and what we're seeing is the result of those conversations and decisions. I'm also a bit perplexed that so many people (not saying it's anyone here) are so sick of the measures after just two weeks that they're calling for changes to lessen all of this, while literally today the Federal Government is releasing MORE restrictive guidelines for the next month. Sorry as well for your loss.