Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

PeaveyFury

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    12,809
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

Milwaukee Brewers News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Top Prospect Rankings

Milwaukee Brewers Videos

2022 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Milwaukee Brewers Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Milwaukee Brewers Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2024 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Milwaukee Brewers Players Project

2025 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by PeaveyFury

  1. I think calling this "likely" is fairly premature at this point. "Possible," sure, but "likely" isn't a given.
  2. I think calling this "likely" is fairly premature at this point. "Possible," sure, but "likely" isn't a given.
  3. If he's the 3 WR, I think 30-40 is perfectly reasonable. Allison caught 34 last year as the 2/3. The issue is, Allison's 34 was a career high, and even then he didn't even come close to the yardage that Funchess reached in those 3 other seasons you note, as he had 100 less yards than Funchess's lowest season, with 11 more receptions. Allison is a poor receiver. Funchess is better than poor. How much better is yet to be determined, but he will outproduce what Allison has done in Green Bay, of that I have no doubt.
  4. If he's the 3 WR, I think 30-40 is perfectly reasonable. Allison caught 34 last year as the 2/3. The issue is, Allison's 34 was a career high, and even then he didn't even come close to the yardage that Funchess reached in those 3 other seasons you note, as he had 100 less yards than Funchess's lowest season, with 11 more receptions. Allison is a poor receiver. Funchess is better than poor. How much better is yet to be determined, but he will outproduce what Allison has done in Green Bay, of that I have no doubt.
  5. Understood, but the point is that Funchess has actually produced in his NFL career, while Allison has basically never done so.
  6. Understood, but the point is that Funchess has actually produced in his NFL career, while Allison has basically never done so.
  7. And if true, that's too bad since this has the potential to kill more of them than all but Vietnam, and even that might not hold up if this isn't taken seriously.
  8. And if true, that's too bad since this has the potential to kill more of them than all but Vietnam, and even that might not hold up if this isn't taken seriously.
  9. Yep. I fully expect a reasonably high draft pick, but not sure if they'll slot a rookie in as the #2 right away. I'd feel better with one more vet, but there's not a ton left out there.
  10. Yep. I fully expect a reasonably high draft pick, but not sure if they'll slot a rookie in as the #2 right away. I'd feel better with one more vet, but there's not a ton left out there.
  11. From what generation did all of the kids go on spring break this year? I know it is a relative sample size, but people in their late teens / early to mid 20's don't seem to take this as serious as older folks. They're Gen Z.
  12. From what generation did all of the kids go on spring break this year? I know it is a relative sample size, but people in their late teens / early to mid 20's don't seem to take this as serious as older folks. They're Gen Z.
  13. And ran a 4.47 at Michigan's pro day, just for the record.
  14. And ran a 4.47 at Michigan's pro day, just for the record.
  15. He had a 63 reception, 840 yard, 8 TD season in 2017, which I'd certainly qualify as good, and it isn't ancient history.
  16. He had a 63 reception, 840 yard, 8 TD season in 2017, which I'd certainly qualify as good, and it isn't ancient history.
  17. You're being way to kind to Allison, who has never exceeded 303 yards in a season. Every one of Funchess's seasons, save for his injury lost 2019, has been significantly better than Allison's 'best' season.
  18. Is the comment about his hands related to his targeted completion percentage? Whether yes or no, I do wonder if he'll be viewed as a better pass catcher when he has a HOF QB throwing to him rather than Cam Newton and his career 59% completion percentage.... It is pretty well known that Funchess has had a bit of a drop problem in his career. Of course, having an inaccurate QB throwing him the ball will play a role in that, but it's still something he needs to improve. His hands have been considered somewhat suspect going back to his time at Michigan. Of course, Davante Adams once had a bit of a drop problem as well. He is proof that a talented receiver can overcome that. I think those are fair points. It's hard to believe he's still so young when he's been in the league for several years now.
  19. Is the comment about his hands related to his targeted completion percentage? Whether yes or no, I do wonder if he'll be viewed as a better pass catcher when he has a HOF QB throwing to him rather than Cam Newton and his career 59% completion percentage....
  20. Who are these people that think covid19 isn’t an issue? Other than naive old people “get off my lawn” “I’m not listening to a word the government says” I’ve yet to find these elusive creatures you speak of. Perhaps they're not in this thread, but you provided a good example with your Grandparents. I have a similar issue with my parents and in-laws, who aren't taking this seriously at all despite being in the danger demographics. As you said, the problem appears to be the gen z people on the beaches, and the boomers who just won't stay home for some reason, but I do think that both those groups don't feel that this is serious at all.
  21. Correct. There are. https://nypost.com/2020/03/24/coronavirus-turning-point-in-us-will-be-earlier-than-predicted-nobel-laureate-says/amp/#click=https://t.co/DFov9P4Rgy https://www.ft.com/content/5ff6469a-6dd8-11ea-89df-41bea055720b https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/03/21/facing-covid-19-reality-national-lockdown-is-no-cure/?outputType=amp#click=https://t.co/tNoyMcLETo It's actually kind of funny that you use media sources to prove your point. It's almost like the media is....not as biased as we are led to believe? And maybe if people actually read full articles instead of headlines and stopped watching cable TV chryons (or stopped watching cable tv news altogether) they'd realize that the Big Bad Media isn't really so bad? And its great there are scientists who think it's not as big a deal as other people. More informed opinions the better. But you have to make sure you are ingesting their opinions as critically as you are the scientists who think it's a huge deal. But I digress... Go to the source. Don't read quotes in an article, read the whole interview verbatim. It’s also worth noting that Michael Levitt (subject of the 1st linked article)notes that while he thinks the duration will be shorter than expected, that he is supportive of “aggressive public health measures” to stop it, as he agrees they work.
  22. Or possibly, it doesn't come because the efforts are working?
  23. Its use as a treatment for COVID-19 is the definition of experimental.
  24. And it's worth noting, the ones that supposedly have positive results are in terribly short supply.
  25. Basically, the right for a patient to try a treatment as a last-ditch effort to try and pull a miracle. I.E., experimental treatments, etc. In this case, I assume it’s ‘hey, this might work but we don’t know, what do you think?’ Or that sort of thing.
×
×
  • Create New...