Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

adambr2

Verified Member
  • Posts

    34,942
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    54

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

News

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Top Prospects Ranking

Milwaukee Brewers Videos

2022 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

Milwaukee Brewers Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

2024 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

The Milwaukee Brewers Players Project

2025 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Pick Tracker

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by adambr2

  1. Obviously I would have agreed with it being a strike. And I do want to see robots, or at least the challenge system from the AS game. All I’m saying is, with the system we currently have, on an 0-2 count, in reality, that pitch in that exact location gets called a strike maybe 50% of the time. This isn’t just something I’m pulling out of my rear end. A 2018 study from Baseball Prospectus and Statcast shows that umpires are 15% more likely to call a strike on a borderline 3-0 pitch, and 12% less likely to call one on a borderline 0-2 pitch. Unfortunately, it ended up being very big that it did not go our way, but it was not egregiously in the strike zone like some pitches we saw against Seattle and Miami.
  2. Joey Ortiz is one guy I would like to see a lot less of in the lineup after the trade deadline.
  3. Cry me a river. I’m as critical as anyone of the umps every night, if you’ve read any gamethread, and I’m constantly calling for robots. So no, you’re wrong. I’ve been calling for robots for longer than yourself. But I’m not so much of a homer that I’m going to get all bent out of shape about an extremely close pitch that probably gets called close to 50/50 in reality.
  4. He definitely should at least be dropped in the order for now. 99% of Brewer fans would have felt much better with Vaughn or Durbin coming up after the two walks, and rightfully so.
  5. It was a super borderline 0-2 pitch. Wasn’t egregiously bad. He actually got 2 calls his way later, but the 0-2 pitch to Suzuki could have gone either way. Blaming the score on that isn’t it.
  6. You really didn’t get the point of anything I said, did you l? There’s nothing they could have to guarantee better results in 2021. There’s nothing they could have done to guarantee better results in 2023. They could have sacrificed the 2025 team for a better shot in those years, if that’s what you’re advocating. What are the massive trades that small market clubs made at the deadline in previous years that was the needle mover in them winning it all?
  7. It’s about his arm health too, though. A 40 pitch inning in 1 inning isn’t like being at 40 pitches through 3.
  8. Lot of truth in this post. I think a healthy way to look at it that can ease some frustration when it gets to be irritating that the Brewers aren’t more aggressive is to ask yourself, “why are the Brewers where they are now?” They’re 61-43, tied for the best record in the National League, and have a loaded farm. All this in spite of their financial limitations. Why, and how? Well, coaching and scouting and development and all that, of course. But the Brewers are also where they are because they didn’t go all-in in 2021. They didn’t go all-in in 2023. The Brewers are as good as they are not just from the moves they’ve made, but the moves they haven’t made. Patience is so crucial when you are a small market. And yes, none of that is to say you shouldn’t make moves, when they are smart and cost-effective, especially when dealing from an area of organizational surplus. But just know no matter what these moves are, the increase to your overall chances is marginal. So the healthiest thing you can do, is try to ensure that year after year, you’re one of the last 12 teams with a chance. They’ve done that. Now they have to be the team that gets the breaks, gets healthy at the right time, gets hot at the right time. I’m as frustrated as anybody that that hasn’t happened yet. But it isn’t a result of bad process. I hope they do make a move or two, by the way. I think it’s part of the excitement of this time of year. But the fact that they’re always keeping the big picture in mind is a good thing, not a bad thing.
  9. The Cubs will definitely do something. I think a rotation upgrade for them is almost a certainty.
  10. Well, I hope it’s not a big deal to you that you did. In my original post I asked if people would feel better or worse about trading Gasser for Suarez, so the misunderstanding was that I thought you intended to say you’d keep Gasser (thus saying no I wouldn’t trade Gasser for Suarez)
  11. Ok, I understand what you were saying now, you’d rather keep Henderson over Gasser. So I guess my question would be, would you part with Gasser to get Suarez, or still keep Gasser.
  12. Assuming you meant Gasser in the context of this reply.
  13. I don’t recall a single comment in this thread insinuating that being good in the regular season is good enough. I myself said it’s time to raise that bar, to strive for playoff success, we’ve been playing October baseball for long enough now to have expectations. Just having those expectations with the grounded reality that there isn’t a move that we can make that can guarantee anything.
  14. For arguments’ sake, would you guys feel any better or worse about shipping Gasser for Suarez rather than Henderson?
  15. One of the proposals I’ve seen in the media is Henderson for Suarez straight up. Wonder how people would feel about that.
×
×
  • Create New...