Few things:
- If MLF gets fired, he’s going to interview at every vacancy that wants to interview him and potentially take multiple bids. If he is acquired in trade, he has one option to talk to and he’s likely going to take a market value long-term extension there. So that’s one point of trading for him versus waiting out the Packers.
- The other leverage on our side is that we don’t actually have to do anything. We can end all talks and bring him back as a lame duck in 2026. He won’t love it, and it’s probably not the best thing for the 2026 Packers, but it is an option, and likely a better one than extending him long-term and then wanting out again at this time next year.
It’s clear at this moment that Policy is willing to stick with Matt for now, but wants to be able to easily pivot in a year or two if things continue to trend the same or worse.
It’s clear that MLF wants commitment from the Packers, doesn’t want to go into 2026 already worried about his job security.
IMO, divorce is best for both sides. I don’t see how you can finish 2025 like MLF did, have the reputation for disappearing in big games like his teams do, and get a long-term extension and NOT be on the hot seat. At the same time, I acknowledge that his regular season is good enough to get a big deal elsewhere where they would be willing to commit to him and he wouldn’t be on the hot seat elsewhere.
MLF really screwed himself last weekend. All he has to do is finish off the Bears, and no matter what happens in Seattle , “choking” is not much of a talking point next week. He’s getting his extension, not everyone is thrilled about it but the main point being made is that his time almost reached the NFCCG with all the injuries.