Article: How Should Sal Frelick's Arrival Alter the Brewers' Approach at the Trade Deadline?

[Matthew Trueblood]

With the MLB trade deadline a week and a half away, the Brewers made a roster change aimed at gaining some important information before making their key trade decisions. They just might have a new clarity about their needs, and about whom they should and shouldn't trade to fill them.

Image courtesy of © Benny Sieu-USA TODAY Sports

The Brewers had a galvanizing, exhilarating, season-shifting Saturday. They called up Sal Frelick and stuck him into the lineup for a nationally-televised home game against the best team in baseball, and the rookie came as close to singlehandedly winning them the game as a right fielder ever can. Frelick had the game-tying and go-ahead RBI, as the team came back from an early 3-0 deficit to win 4-3. Just as importantly, he made two dazzling catches near the fence in right, taking extra-base hits away as the Braves tried to add to their lead.

Frelick now figures to be the everyday right fielder, or at least the strong side of a platoon with Tyrone Taylor. Until Taylor shows that he's regained his health and his form more completely than he did in his previous healthy stint, it should be mostly Frelick out there. The skills he showed with his hits and his sacrifice fly Saturday are the ones that made him a top prospect: a good approach, great feel for contact, and solid speed. He also, clearly, fits perfectly into one of the league's best defenses, a unit the Brewers have carefully cultivated and emphasized throughout the season. He shores up and lengthens the lineup nicely, though he clearly won't turn them overnight from a lousy offense into an average or better one.

This development doesn't quite eliminate the possibility of a trade for a right fielder. Frelick has played center field the (narrow) majority of the time in the minors this year, and was primarily a center fielder last year. He could just as easily platoon with Joey Wiemer as with Taylor or Blake Perkins, should a good opportunity arise for the Brewers to trade for a right fielder. The better odds, though, have always been that the Brewers would find a first baseman or designated hitter to beef up the middle of the order, and Frelick being around makes that even more likely.

That assumes, of course, that Frelick is still around on the other side of August 1. One reason to call up a prospect in the shadow of the approaching trade deadline is to showcase them for a potential trade. That's unlikely in this case, especially after Frelick immediately won the hearts of Brewers fans everywhere, but his trade stock rose right along with his Q-score on Saturday night. More plausibly, the team could take Frelick's arrival as an opportunity to shop Garrett Mitchell, who would be their dynamic, young left-handed outfielder if he weren't shelved with season-ending shoulder surgery back in April.

Teams would give up more for Frelick than for Mitchell, of course, because the latter now has additional question marks on his scouting report--ones about his health and long-term prognosis, to go with the ones that already existed about his ability to make sufficient contact to get to his power and speed. However, the very fact of Frelick being in the mix (and, the Brewers hope, the improvement he brings to the offense even before they pursue external upgrades) could also make it less urgent that the team acquire someone new, anyway. If Frelick weren't part of the lineup, the team would need to trade for someone so good that they would need to trade Frelick to get them. If he can stick and help out on both sides of the ledger, they only need someone of the quality they can attain for a package starting with Mitchell.

One game shouldn't guide the Brewers too forcefully. They should still keep the need for a big bat (ideally a right-handed one) front and center in their minds. With Frelick in the big-league fold, though, the necessary form of that deal is a bit less drastic, and they can husband their long-term resources (both talent and money) more closely, without it hurting their chances of winning the NL Central or making a run in October.

View full article

[Frisbee Slider]

I agree that one game from Frelick is a small sample. Is there a compelling reason to play Tyrone Taylor over any of the other outfielders on the roster?

[Brock Beauchamp]

6 minutes ago, Frisbee Slider said:

I agree that one game from Frelick is a small sample. Is there a compelling reason to play Tyrone Taylor over any of the other outfielders on the roster?

It's gonna be hard to keep that 1 wRC+ out of the lineup.

There is one compelling reason to play Taylor and that's which side of the plate he stands on when he bats. I know we're all stans for Monasterio at this point but I'm highlyyyyyyyyy skeptical of his continued performance.

[wiguy94]

Maybe they don’t need to trade for an OF anymore if Frelick can come in and be a league average hitter from the start. 

They still need to trade for a 1B and DH though. Preferably the 1B is RHH and can hit LHP.

C: Contreras 

1B: Trade acquisition 

2B: Turang (regardless of how people feel about his bat, seems like Brewers are intent on keeping him in the lineup)

3B: Anderson 

SS: Adames 

LF: Yelich 

CF: Wiemer 

RF: Frelick 

DH: Trade acquisition 

Bench: Caratini, Monasterio, Miller, Perkins

Basically they need to trade for 2 bats that could hit 3rd and 4th in our order to slide the Adames/Miller 3/4 duo down in the order.

[LouisEly]

I think the top target has to be Bellinger as he can play RF, CF, 1B, or DH.  Yeah, maybe he's been a bit lucky, but he's likely to be a lot better than what they've had at those positions.

[Team Canada]

I think "season shifting" is a bit hyperbolic at this point.

[CheezWizHed]

I don't think it has to change anything about trade targets.  I think if a good RF comes available at a good price, you grab him.  That results in Taylor playing less and probably costs Perkins a position.  Sal and Joey split in CF (with Sal also getting some LF/RF).  

Great breakout by the rookie, but no guarantees on what he can provide, so insurance is always good.