I guess that I don't get all the uproar about this. First of all, any time you get a large group of 500 some people together, you are bound to get some idiots. From my experience, on average, sports writers seem more sanctimonious and come off as know it all's more than the average person, so it shouldn't be a surprise that some decide that their vote will be some type of statement. As for LeBetard, I'm glad they stripped him of his voting privileges. I have no doubt that this was a publicity stunt on his part... I'm not a fan of his at all, he likes to interject himself into things..definitely an attention (I'll be nice and say) seeker. Bottom line, the voting system has always been a bit flawed for better or worse- if nothing else, it sparks fun debates such as this one. As for the 100% thing, it's gotten to be a self fulfilling prophecy. I'd be willing to bet that no one will ever attain it for the simple reason that "(insert any baseball immortal) didn't even get 100%". For what it's worth, I think the writers did OK with this vote. In my view, cheaters like Bonds and Clemens have no business in the Hall, and I believe that if you took a vote with baseball fans, the split would be very similar to how the writers voted.