I find it hard to believe that anyone can justify ranking them in the bottom half of the league. Even if those publications/websites put more emphasis on more advanced players it seems to me Milwaukee's depth would make up for it. Can you share how the 18, 18, and 20 rankings were justified? If I had to guess I would say high volatility. We have quite a few guys with high ceiling but low floors. They could be stars, busts, or anything in between.