http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/sports/wp/2015/11/23/running-up-the-bills/?utm_term=.4af3b0d1ad87 Very lengthy and somewhat old article. However, it has a lot of good charts, graphs, and content. Let's follow a train of thought: athletes get a scholarship and also get a stipend from the school. What should that stipend be? $200/week? What would that stipend be used for? The 53" TVs I see in many athletes rooms might not be big enough, I guess. Also, keep in mind that for sports like softball, swimming, wrestling, etc., athletes rarely get a 100% full ride. Many times, the program is given a small number of scholarships, 8 for example, that need to be divided up among 20 athletes. What do athletes at D1 schools receive? (my daughter played softball at a D3 school, and received none of these) Training table (i.e. food), a personal athletic trainer, tutors if necessary, among other things. The daughter of a friend of mine is playing volleyball at the University of Minnesota. She was surprised when each member of the team has their own personal trainer. Yes... a 1-to-1 ratio. She is only receiving a 50% scholarship (IIRC), but is getting a lot of other benefits that I never had access to. Should those trainers be paid? I doubt they would be. They will most likely graduate with tens of thousands in debt while my friends daughter will most likely have little to no debt. Players should not be paid a salary above and beyond their scholarship... period.