I'll try again though I thought it was pretty clear. I didn't take a position one way or the other on the existence of clutch and I didn't offer possible sources in support of it. The only stand I took on clutch is that I think it's a difficult statistical problem. I'll rephrase the statement I have a problem with as If there were such a thing as clutch, wouldn't a player being doing a disservice to his team by not performing at the same level in all situations? Others have previously followed up a statistical argument concerning clutch expressing the same idea as If there were such a thing as clutch, why wouldn't a player try harder all the time, not just in clutch situtations? I'm saying that IMO that attempt at a logical argument doesn't work. Human responses to given situations are partly conscious, partly subconscious and partly physiological so a player, if there were such a thing as clutch, wouldn't have full control over his responses in non-clutch situations. The difference in performance, if there were such a thing as clutch, would be the result of a difference in everything that controls a player's(or any human's) reactions to different situations. Bottom line is, I'm suggesting people debating the clutch issue, stick to the statistical argument or come up with a more logical logical argument.