Of course they are not, but I'm talking about expected contribution for the remainder of the year. If you had to mark out your lowest and highest contribution estimates from both guys there's going to be a lot of overlap and if that's the case, why are you spending reasonable capital for a scratch off opportunity?
Outside of the obvious one guy, there is no one we can currently acquire who is assured to outperform Logan or Shane so we are acquiring a #5 and if that's the case - cost to performance skews hard in the direction of scrap heap types.