Let me get this straight right out of the gate - I really like Mike Cameron. He's obviously fantastic defensively and he's got good power for a CF, not to mention he's become a leader on the team. The Cameron bashing (mainly on radio) really bothers me, the guy is a class act. But I'm wondering how large of a dropoff it would be from Cameron to a guy like Gerut - I don't know the defensive metrics on Gerut in CF, but if he isn't an adequate CF I'd discard this idea entirely. I think pretty much every player benefits from more ABs and perhaps I'm overestimating him based on his 2008 season but I think he can put up a .270/.340 kind of line with an everyday job. I just feel like if Weeks comes back strong you're looking at - Weeks, Escobar/Hardy, Braun, Fielder, Cameron, Gamel/McGehee, Hart, and whoever's catching. Take out Cameron and I still think that lineup could be pretty potent. What I'm getting at is if they can use the 10 mil+ he'll get in arbitration to bring in better pitching I'd think the Brewers would want to consider taking advantage of that opportunity. You could argue that acquiring pitching through free agency is a bit of a crapshoot, but most of the Brewers' pitching depth is in A ball and I just don't see anyone from within they haven't tried who they could be confident in trotting out there every 5th day in 2010. If they can use that money to improve the pitching staff (though Mike Cameron by himself improves the pitching staff) isn't it worth releasing Cameron, taking the draft pick, and bolstering the starting rotation? It's not like they'd be spending all 10+ million on one pitcher either - you can fill a few holes or pick up a few raises in arbitration with 10-12 million bucks.