nate82

With what pitch? His best pitch is basically dead in Coors. The batters won't have to worry about his breaking pitches and will just sit on his FB which will get crushed.

Probably should have pinch hit for Hoskins in that spot with Bauers.

Wasn't really the contact play. You are going home on that no matter what. Either you are out at 1st or out at home there. There are still two outs so where the out occurs doesn't really matter.

Yelich looked out there.

Hudson would be a bad option in Colorado. His sweeper is basically a HR ball in Coors. I wouldn't pitch Hudson in this stadium his stuff is just not useful due to the thin air.

A single but if he was thrown out then CI. What is weird with the CI rule is that it states a runner can only advance one base but Adames took two bases. With the runners part it sounds like it can be a dead ball play or the HP umpire can let it be live and similar to the infield fly rule the runner can advance at their own risk. I wonder if Adames were to be thrown out at 3rd if the manager can elect to have the CI instead? I think the rule only applies to the batter and not the runner unless the runner is forced out at a base. https://www.mlb.com/glossary/rules/catcher-interference

I see you know nothing about technology. You can't just do a software upgrade on a piece of equipment that is not compatible with the software update. Try updating an original Iphone to the most recent Iphone software. It is not possible for a lot of reasons but one being the chipset not being compatible with the new software. The software is written for a specific CPU. In this case it will be for one set of instructions for a set of CPU's. If your old EV doesn't have this CPU then you can't get the software update you are stuck with the old software. Don't even think about upgrading the board because that will be a proprietary board for the manufacturer and they will charge an arm and a leg for these boards. The media control unit on a Tesla costs about $3k. Expect to pay at least that if not more to get your car upgraded to the newest software.

Summer + midwest equals construction. It is impossible to not run into some kind of road construction in the midwest during the summer.

I believe most are coming from Kenosha and Racine as both are basically Chicago suburbs.

I don't even agree with your premise it seems like you picked a number to agree with your "pilling on" runs. I think 6 runs or more would be more of a qualifier of "piling on" runs as 4 runs on average is going to win you a game more times than not. The Brewers have scored 6 runs or more 8 times this month. So they have been "piling on" runs plenty enough.

Yelich and Contreras are the only likely two players to be all stars for the Brewers. Depending on who are the only AS's for the Nationals, Rockies, Cubs, Mets and Pirates it is unlikely Turang makes it same with Ortiz and the many bullpen arms deserving of an AS bid for the Brewers.

Of the 15 games 9 wins have come with 5 runs or more with only 4 of those 15 wins being less than 4 runs. Sounds about average scoring to me.

Who had Turang with 2 GS on their BINGO card?

Easier said than done. Turang just tried to go oppo and well just weakly popped it up.

Teams don't normally trade multiple players in one deal. Even if the players are of lesser value it makes more sense to trade the players individually. You just don't get as much value back in return if you are trading two players to one team in one deal. The team trading for both players are also not going to want to give up the value each has on an individual level. This is one of the many reasons you don't see teams trading multiple players in one deal unless it is a 3-team deal. These trades where multiple MLB players are going to one team are in the minority of trades. If the Brewers are trading with Toronto it will be for one player not a Kikuchi and another MLB player. You could probably get Kikuchi for Brown and Blalock or something like Baez, O'Rae and someone from the DSL. It just doesn't make much sense for Toronto to move multiple MLB pieces for a lower value. As for Black the only way I would trade him would be for someone like Vlad but the Blue Jays are hesitant on trading him or Bichette. The Blue Jays are basically the 2010 Brewers but have to make a decision on two players instead of one (Prince). The Blue Jays don't want to tear it down but they also don't look like they can be all that competitive in the AL East or even the AL Wild Card race even with the added WC. I think the Blue Jays will decide on Bichette and Vlad in the off season. So look for the Blue Jays to only trade off the pieces they think won't be around for their next run. So don't expect anyone significant to be traded away with multiple years of control left.

Culpepper is probably the only under slot at 17 I would consider for the Brewers. Cam Smith is the player you want to drop and hopefully makes it to the Brewers but that would take an over slot deal for him.

I believe all or nearly all of their EV delivery vehicles are Rivian.

AJ would have been available in the 2nd round they could absolutely have traded out of this pick for a couple of extra 2nd's if they wanted to. This is just a dumb decision. AJ probably needs to play in the G league for at least one year and maybe two. He has not jump shot and is even rawer than Giannis was when he was drafted. AJ is not the athlete Giannis was when he was drafted. This was just a dumb decision by the Bucks and I am not sure what they were even thinking here.

Sigh of course they do something dumb and draft a 2nd round pick in the first round.

Holmes is the one I wanted. I guess Kolek as a backup PG wouldn't be the worst option.

LOL Memphis. Really you are going to take Edey at 9? That is going to be a huge bust of a pick.

Who owns the most inside the park home runs in the modern era in a single season? I don’t think it’s more than three?

That didn’t look like it was hit that well. Watching without sound at work.

Somehow that looks to be incorrect by the eyeball test. All of Frelick’s throws seem to be lower than that.