Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Underachiever

Verified Member
  • Posts

    3,973
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

News

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Top Prospects Ranking

Milwaukee Brewers Videos

2022 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

Milwaukee Brewers Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

2024 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

The Milwaukee Brewers Players Project

2025 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Underachiever

  1. I know the state motto. Lived here for many years. My point was that in the photo above, the word seems to appear on the inside of the jersey. And I agree that I don't think anyone says Wisco. But, since Sconnie (another thing no one says) is trademarked, and Wisky is probably not good for the kids, they are trying to make fetch happen.
  2. Nothing says city connect like having the name of your state on the front. and is Forward on the inside of the jersey?
  3. Brewers looking like the Sox. Dropped pickoff by Sanchez, Perkins messes up a pop up, and possibly the no challenge by Quero, Sproat with his first out on his 26th pitch.
  4. Is this too early to say that the White Sox are a bad team? They have made some bad, bad plays in only 11 innings this year. Today alone, Benintendi’s two plays, throwing to 3rd allowing Bauers to take seconds, bad challenge, the play that allowed the 4th run to score. I mean, it’s the second inning!
  5. Yelich starts the year with an 0-2 count. Watch the first pitch, swing and miss at the second. He does that a lot. I think he was in the top ten of plate appearances with an 0-2 count. Can't find the info to back that up right now.
  6. This is fine. Name me one example of a Brewer player having a broken middle finger that lingered through the season. Where's that "Are the Brewers Lucky" thread again?
  7. Update: I called again, and they are canceling my current subscription and refunding me the $149 so I can buy the $199 package. She said, "we've refunded your money, you should call your credit card company if you are not seeing it." I checked my card, no activity. Then I got an email confirming the refund from MLB. It was time stamped. The refund was granted during my phone call. Gee, no wonder my CC company hadn't gotten the refund yet. I'd kind of like that confirmation before I spend another $200. Bottom line, I got what I wanted. Go Brewers!
  8. PCA will probably be pretty good. Edit: I see @sveumrulesposted the exact same thing, only with more words. Tomato, tomahto. I kid, of course. sveumrules is a gem.
  9. Hey Yahoo, and everyone else, can we stop with "cold corner" as a term? It's stupid. According to the Google, it started gaining use in 2012. I hadn't heard it until this winter. It doesn't describe first base at all. The only reason that first base isn't the hot corner is that there are fewer LH hitters. There is more action at first base in every single game than at second and third combined. Grumble grumble. Fight me.
  10. Here is my situation. I have subscribed to MLB.tv for several years now. The renewal happens in February. My $149 renewal went through. They want $99 for the Brewers now. I called and asked to get the $199 bundle (MLB and Brewers) and save the extra $50 that it would cost to add the Brewers (MLB $149 and Brewers $99). They created a case, as the phone support reps say that they cannot approve that. I have gotten no response, except for an email that said my ticket would be closed automatically within 24 hours.
  11. I think if the Brewers were lucky, they wouldn't have lost Yelich (x2), Devin Williams, and Woodruff (x2) late in the season.
  12. I was a big baby about this loss. Didn't log on to this thread til this morning. I had the same discussion with a friend where he outlined why the Badgers have lost in the tourney with a lot of the same talking points this thread has provided. Iowa just beat a one-seed with Stirtz going 0-9 from three, so it's possible to get it done without a great game from your players. I am really tired of talking about under-seeded opponents. Okay, if High Point was under-seeded, how much under-seeded? Should they have been a 10? an 8? Didn't the Badgers go 6-3 against Sweet 16 teams, including beating a 1, a 2, and two of the three seeds? When the only proof that a team is under-seeded is that they beat UW, that's just proof after the fact. Maybe the Badgers should get a 13 or 14-seed so they can play teams they can beat in the first round. They have had their season ended by a lower seed every seasons but one since 2019 (Baylor, 2021). The only one of those lower seeds that won their next game was when number 12 Oregon beat number 13 UCI in the next round. Tournament performance has been a real blemish on Gard and the UW.
  13. That was the same rationale people provided for the Badgers making a run. Didn't work out that way.
  14. 91-71. Should win the division, but definitely be good enough for a WC if not.
  15. That was a point you were trying to make. Why should I do it for you? I assumed you were too exhausted to make it, or you wouldn't have asked me to do it for you in the first place. Now I have the knowledge, and I see your point.
×
×
  • Create New...