I think the point is that if you believe that the coaches, etc. have been misleading or at least not telling the whole story regarding Bahk, you have to also assume that the plan was for him to start this week. There's no way they would have wasted a roster spot on him vs. shelving him if they legit expected the injury to linger into week 4 or beyond. The only two logical options are that 1)They always planned on him starting vs. TB, or 2)he's had a modest setback that was unexpected, so there's no misleading stuff going on. If the setback was severe, he'd be on the IL.