Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

giffted1

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,487

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

News

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Top Prospects Ranking

Milwaukee Brewers Videos

2022 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

Milwaukee Brewers Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

2024 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

The Milwaukee Brewers Players Project

2025 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by giffted1

  1. giffted1
    Yeah, I've heard about it too. Just another reason to use Firefox. Here's the story.
  2. giffted1
    I know there were a lot of people who like Arrested Development so I thought I'd mention this. Today only you can get all 3 seasons of Arrested Development on Amazon.com for under $30.
  3. giffted1
    I'd be perfectly fine with just bringing Counsell back for the right price.
  4. giffted1
    If we were considering Taveras, we might as well just put Gwynn in CF. Their batting projections are similar, and we're already paying Gwynn. I really hope it wouldn't come down to that, though.
  5. giffted1
    It's already been stated that Melvin can't shift the money that would have gone toward Sabathia to other FA's, but I'm sure you already knew that. I'd like to sign Sheets too, but if he doesn't want to return, there's not much Melvin can do. It's sad that you're writing off the season in early December.
  6. giffted1
    The whole idea of this trade seems to be dumping salary. Why would we want to add Cano's contract?
  7. giffted1
    That's insane. We might as well have just declined the option on Cam and put Gwynn in center if that is the case. Melky's ops projection is only 30 points higher than Gwynn's. Yikes.
  8. giffted1
    If we're getting a young pitcher back as well, okay. Otherwise, this deal really stinks. Sure it'll free up some money to pursue a free agent, but it would just mean filling a hole by creating a different one.
  9. giffted1
    If we're getting a young pitcher back as well, okay. Otherwise, this deal really stinks. Sure it'll free up some money to pursue a free agent, but it would just mean filling a hole by creating a different one.
  10. giffted1
    If we're getting a young pitcher back as well, okay. Otherwise, this deal really stinks. Sure it'll free up some money to pursue a free agent, but it would just mean filling a hole by creating a different one.
  11. giffted1
    If we're getting a young pitcher back as well, okay. Otherwise, this deal really stinks. Sure it'll free up some money to pursue a free agent, but it would just mean filling a hole by creating a different one.
  12. giffted1
    If we're getting a young pitcher back as well, okay. Otherwise, this deal really stinks. Sure it'll free up some money to pursue a free agent, but it would just mean filling a hole by creating a different one.
  13. giffted1
    If we're getting a young pitcher back as well, okay. Otherwise, this deal really stinks. Sure it'll free up some money to pursue a free agent, but it would just mean filling a hole by creating a different one.
  14. giffted1
    If we're getting a young pitcher back as well, okay. Otherwise, this deal really stinks. Sure it'll free up some money to pursue a free agent, but it would just mean filling a hole by creating a different one.
  15. giffted1
    If we're getting a young pitcher back as well, okay. Otherwise, this deal really stinks. Sure it'll free up some money to pursue a free agent, but it would just mean filling a hole by creating a different one.
  16. giffted1
    If we're getting a young pitcher back as well, okay. Otherwise, this deal really stinks. Sure it'll free up some money to pursue a free agent, but it would just mean filling a hole by creating a different one.
  17. giffted1
    If we're getting a young pitcher back as well, okay. Otherwise, this deal really stinks. Sure it'll free up some money to pursue a free agent, but it would just mean filling a hole by creating a different one.
  18. giffted1
    If we're getting a young pitcher back as well, okay. Otherwise, this deal really stinks. Sure it'll free up some money to pursue a free agent, but it would just mean filling a hole by creating a different one.
  19. giffted1
    If we're getting a young pitcher back as well, okay. Otherwise, this deal really stinks. Sure it'll free up some money to pursue a free agent, but it would just mean filling a hole by creating a different one.
  20. giffted1
    If we're getting a young pitcher back as well, okay. Otherwise, this deal really stinks. Sure it'll free up some money to pursue a free agent, but it would just mean filling a hole by creating a different one.
  21. giffted1
    If we're getting a young pitcher back as well, okay. Otherwise, this deal really stinks. Sure it'll free up some money to pursue a free agent, but it would just mean filling a hole by creating a different one.
  22. giffted1
    If we're getting a young pitcher back as well, okay. Otherwise, this deal really stinks. Sure it'll free up some money to pursue a free agent, but it would just mean filling a hole by creating a different one.
  23. giffted1
    If we're getting a young pitcher back as well, okay. Otherwise, this deal really stinks. Sure it'll free up some money to pursue a free agent, but it would just mean filling a hole by creating a different one.
  24. giffted1
    If we're getting a young pitcher back as well, okay. Otherwise, this deal really stinks. Sure it'll free up some money to pursue a free agent, but it would just mean filling a hole by creating a different one.
  25. giffted1
    If we're getting a young pitcher back as well, okay. Otherwise, this deal really stinks. Sure it'll free up some money to pursue a free agent, but it would just mean filling a hole by creating a different one.
×
×
  • Create New...