As you said right now the NL is highly competitive. You could make a pretty strong argument that there are only 3 "bad" teams (Marlins, Reds, Padres). The rest, including L.A, could reasonably consider themselves buyers if this continues, although I expect (hope?) to see Pittsburgh slip into that group as well. The A.L. is not a whole lot different. Just a few very bad teams at the bottom, a lot of competitive teams at the top. There is still a lot of time and some teams will fall off, and perhaps some teams that aren't doing so well right now like the Dodgers and Twins might rebound. Still, if this trend continues, here's what I would guess we see: - Very little separation from beginning to end in races, with highly competitive division races that come down to the last week, and perhaps 90 games winning a division while 88 win teams sit at home. - A barren trade deadline market for buyers, and a great market for sellers who can essentially name their price, even on rentals. Teams like the Cubs, who have very little to offer from their farm system, can forget about getting any real deadline help without parting with MLB pieces like Schwarber or Happ. - Perhaps, deadline deals that involve teams that are both buyers, trading surplus areas to try to shore up a weak area. For example, if we take our time with Nelson and he doesn't return until July, if we have starters like Guerra, Chacin and Miley performing at high levels then, would it make sense to try to swing a deal with a contender who may have a very weak starting rotation but high level middle infielders with their own internal high prospects ready to take those spots? It's possible. Obviously, this is all speculative right now, just something fun to talk about because it's May.