That's the thing. I don't believe people are properly valuing Hader as a reliever vs. as a starter. I also don't believe WAR is going to properly value him. People see 175 innings from him as a starter and 90-100 as a reliever and just assume, "175 is more than 90-100, so he's more valuable as a starter." It's not that simple. At least I don't believe it is. I can't properly evaluate how much it means to be able to pick and choose your spots with him, but I believe our front office is trying to do so. We have a very analytically driven F.O. and these short hooks for starters and long innings for the pen are not a coincidence. And for the most part, it's working. The fact that we are sitting at 17-13 with the 5th WORST offense in baseball is a testament to how perfectly the pitching staff has been managed. Ironically, the biggest selling point to me on how much value Hader has as a reliever is a very simple stat -- we are 11-0 in games when he is used. What would our record be in those games without him? Its impossible to say, but consider that almost all 11 of those games are, by design and how we like to use him, very close and competitive games. And we've won them all, large in part to what he brings to the pen.