Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Recommended Posts

Posted

I think this is a defensible position to hold. It certainly confirms the preexisting notion of many fans. His regular season data is interestng Though, I would like to see him include xwOBA and not just wOBA into his analysis.  

However, the postseason data is still a super small sample size. Is there a carry over effect? Very well could be but hard to say for certain under those circumstances when it could also chalked up to random variation and luck. I think the Brewers' position would be their bats are due to have a sustained hot streak during the postseason one of these years, and that combined with their typically strong pitching could be enough to win them a WS. 

Increased power undoubtedly helps make up for that. Which may be why you're seeing a greater organizational emphasis such as the Andrew Fischer draft pick last year. 

Community Moderator
Posted

I agree that it’s a reasonable hypothesis but the sample of pitchers used is quite small (just 38 good and 38 bad). He doesn’t say what fraction of our total ABs are in his sample but it’s probably very small since we face 400+ pitchers per season. 
 

A .270 wOBA against the top pitchers is also not terrible. It’s more that we absolutely destroy bad pitching while we are mediocre against very good pitching. 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...