Sure you can, but it's not just about Segura because then we'd have Odorizzi, Escobar, and Cain. Odorizzi would be in the rotation for us, we'd still have an excellent defender at SS in Escobar, Lohse wouldn't be around, and we'd still have a 1st round pick this season... and the domino effect goes on and on. Picking up Segura who everyone apparently undervalued doesn't justify continually trading for short term pitching. We're as fortunate to have Segura as we are to have Aoki who Milwaukee didn't even scout. I'm thrilled to have Segura, I have no issues with flipping Greinke, I just wouldn't have targeted him, Marcum, or Sabathia in the first place. Having made different moves we'd certainly have a different team than we do now but I have a hard time believing we'd be worse off from a pitching standpoint, in fact I think we'd actually be better all the way around. I know people valued the playoff appearance in 2008 or think that Melvin made the only moves he could but I just don't feel that way. I'm not justifying Melvin's moves. I'm just saying what's if's are just that. So why bother dwelling on them? If your goal is to put a case together against Melvin as a GM, then sure, those would be valid arguments. But that's not the point of this thread.