Perhaps in the micro, where dirty pitcher faces dirty batter, then the outcome may not be reliant on PED use. But in the macro, where clean fringe guys can't make the roster because dirty fringe guys had better performance, that's a big deal for the clean guy. And if fans were lead to believe someone was clean and he wasn't, that's still the same size deal it was before. To some, it's no big deal, to others it could be. yeah that is certainly true. I was thinking more from the standpoint of how much the stats themselves matter. If 80% of players used steroids it means the stats themselves aren't all that corrupted. My guess is Gagne is full of it or the Dodgers were on the heavier end of usage and that less than 50% used so those stats are all tainted.