Again no. You should never be making a pick based on need ever. I don't care where you are picking you never pick based on need you always take the best player available. If the BPA is a pitcher and you are stacked at pitching guess what you are taking the pitcher because they are the BPA. I completely disagree with this as well. There have been plenty of examples where teams have selected based on some other criteria besides BPA and have worked out well. Take the 2009 draft as an example as most of the first-round players selected have graduated or been phased out on their natural timelines. Both Mike Minor or Mike Leake were not the BPA's early in the draft, both have resulted in a ton of quality starts and have received playoff experience. Tyler Matzek, widely regarded as having better frontline stuff out of the draft hasn't pitched a major-league inning. Drew Storen, also in the same draft taken as a known-reliever has turned into a serviceable MLB pitcher while better athletes such as Jared Mitchell, Randal Grichuk, and Brett Jackson have struggled. While these examples don't define any universal rule with regard to draft strategy, I believe that's the point in itself. There doesn't seem to be any correlation with a BPA attitude working on as any overriding rule. (Matt Bush, Donovan Tate, Dustin Ackley, Kyle Skipworth, Justin Smoak, and on and on and on)